We are a worldwide social network of freethinkers, atheists, agnostics and secular humanists.
i d like to get your ideas about the types of atheism and if they all are justifiable form of atheism. Because if you make arguments about the non- exisistance of god or gods , counter arguments are soon forged against your rational arguments. My question is shoud we base our atheistic views on evindence or arguments ?
Nice Comment
Search cyberspace for "six kinds of atheists" and you might find the study done at the University of Tennessee. Then go where you want to go.
Jaume when you want to prove a point you really want to prove that point. Ha Ha.
Perhaps you can base your argument on the world is 6000 years old and hold steadfast to that.
Are you a Christian Identity movement member?
You should probably base your argument on the world is only 6000 years old and hold steadfast to that.
Stephen, i once read it but forgot all about it. it is called Russell's teapot. Russell wrote that if one claims that a teapot orbits the Sun somewhere in space between the Earth and Mars, it is nonsensical for him to expect others to believe him on the grounds that they cannot prove him wrong. i understand now what you mean. thanks for your comments you and onyango.
There is no absolute evidence for the existence or non existence of Gods but their is high probability's. Its not up to us Atheists to prove the non existence of God. its up to the proposers ie believers to prove the existence of Gods. Read Bertrand Russell's analogy for the non existence of God he was really helpful and succinct.
arguments don't constitute evidence, they are rationalizations and nothing more.
© 2021 Created by Atheist Universe.
Powered by
Badges | Report an Issue | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
You need to be a member of Atheist Universe to add comments!
Join Atheist Universe