Feedback/Notes

 

Latest Activity

Grinning Cat replied to Loren Miller's discussion George Carlin - On Why Our Species Is Failing (1992) in the group Quote Of The Day
"Excellent summary of what ought to be the first concern of any society: "Is everybody okay?…"
3 hours ago
Mrs.B commented on Sydni Moser's group Coffee Break
"Amazing video."
3 hours ago
Stephen Brodie commented on Sydni Moser's group Coffee Break
"Instruments actually perceived the pressure wave from the first blast in the Mid-West of…"
5 hours ago
Mrs.B replied to Loren Miller's discussion George Carlin - On Why Our Species Is Failing (1992) in the group Quote Of The Day
"Sure wish he'd been cloned a few hundred thousand times!"
5 hours ago
Mrs.B commented on Sydni Moser's group Coffee Break
"Yes, our west coastal areas are warned of tsunami risk."
5 hours ago
Stephen Brodie commented on Sydni Moser's group Coffee Break
"I know you've probably all seen this before but just been listening to a discussion about the…"
5 hours ago
Grinning Cat replied to Grinning Cat's discussion Camo Cats in the group Atheist Cat Servants
"Another camo cat from cheezburger.com:"
5 hours ago
Stephen Brodie commented on Loren Miller's group Quote Of The Day
""Botched job," really does say it all "
5 hours ago
Mrs.B commented on Loren Miller's group Quote Of The Day
"Botched job barely covers it."
6 hours ago
Loren Miller commented on Loren Miller's group Quote Of The Day
""Botched job," indeed.  Considering all the "mistakes" evolution made in…"
8 hours ago
Loren Miller added a discussion to the group Quote Of The Day
Thumbnail

George Carlin - On Why Our Species Is Failing (1992)

Besides being a brilliant comedian and practiced public ranter, George Carlin was a adept student…See More
10 hours ago
Terence Meaden commented on Loren Miller's group Quote Of The Day
"I love this for the power and perfection of the two choice words 'botched job'. Emma…"
11 hours ago
Loren Miller commented on Loren Miller's group Quote Of The Day
"I do not believe in God, because I believe in man. Whatever his mistakes, man has for thousands of…"
14 hours ago
RichardtheRaelian left a comment for Suzanne Johnson
""Happy Birthday!""
18 hours ago
Chris B commented on Sydni Moser's group Coffee Break
"Good video!"
19 hours ago
Mrs.B commented on Sydni Moser's group Coffee Break
"Well said, Mr. O'Brien."
yesterday
Stephen Brodie commented on Sydni Moser's group Coffee Break
"Good one Ian  "
yesterday
Ian Mason commented on Sydni Moser's group Coffee Break
yesterday
Ian Mason commented on Sydni Moser's group Coffee Break
"Chris, idioms and figures of speech are a lot of fun. Thanks for those."
yesterday
Ian Mason commented on Sydni Moser's group Coffee Break
"Indeed, Stephen there are a lot of distractions being thrown up (the BBC, navy used against…"
yesterday

We are a worldwide social network of freethinkers, atheists, agnostics and secular humanists.

Brian Tyler Cohen on Roe and a Pending SCOTUS Case

Brian Tyler Cohen has been producing political commentary on YouTube for the past couple of years.  Generally, his traditional format has been to start with a video clip of some event, whether a speech in the House or Senate or an incident in the field, then comment on that event or incident.  Such videos will usually see him in a neatly tailored suit and tie and likely reading his script from a teleprompter.

Then there are those rare times when Brian is speaking both off the cuff and out of uniform, and the following is one of those occasions.  With the advent of the Supreme Court of the United States considering the Mississippi abortion law and the possible implications that case may have for Roe v Wade, I suspect his own concern for the continued integrity of that decision and more importantly, for women’s rights and access to abortion, are in the foreground of his mind.  That said, Mr. Cohen just recorded an utterly on-point rant regarding not just that case, but the environment in which it is set.  He also addresses the religious undertones which essentially constitute the entire opposition to Roe and why they should be disregarded.

And somehow, he delivers the whole package in 54 seconds!  Here it is:



And in case you can’t pull up the video in your area, here is a transcript:

Okay, here is something I have been meaning to say, now that right-wing theocrats are poised to officially gut Roe and a woman’s access to a safe and legal abortion in the United States.  And that is that this is not some pro-life versus pro-choice argument.  If you’re pro-life, fine.  If your religion frowns upon abortion, that’s okay.  Don’t get one.  But part of living in a free country is the freedom to practice any religion or no religion.  Meaning that while you might follow dictates on who can or can’t get abortions, the next person might not.  This country and its laws aren’t your church; your church is your church.  That distinction is so important that the separation of church and state is right there in the very first clause of the Bill of Rights in the Constitution, the Establishment Clause.  So look, you can think that abortion is morally reprehensible.  You can despise it with every fiber of your being, and that’s your prerogative.  But if you want to crow about how we live in a free country, then you have to recognize that it’s not only free on the issues that are convenient for you.
-- Brian Tyler Cohen

Views: 40

Nice Comment

You need to be a member of Atheist Universe to add comments!

Join Atheist Universe

Comment was by Grinning Cat on December 4, 2021 at 2:32pm

Rather, Rebalance and Enlarge the Court!!! (The "Packing" was already done by McConnell and the Republican Party.)

Prof. Stephen Feldman argues that we don't need to fear a pendulum of partisan tit-for-tat enlargements:

"All right, the fact is that the current court as constituted does not reflect popular votes for president. Like, seven out of the last eight elections, the popular vote was for the Democrat, yet the Supreme Court is controlled 6-3 by conservative majority. If there was court-packing or an expansion of the court and you had a progressive majority on the court and then there was voting rights legislation, the court would most likely uphold that voting rights legislation.

So if the people who actually get to vote and decide, then the odds are that there won't be, as it's sometimes referred to, tit-for-tat court-packing, right? It's not like the Republicans will suddenly seize control of the House, the Senate and the presidency, which would be required to expand the court again. If the Republicans ever do that, it'll be a different Republican Party from what we have today."

(From "The Case For Court Packing As A Way To Promote Democracy" on NPR, with Michel Martin interviewing professor Stephen Feldman from the University of Wyoming School of Law, who's the author of "Pack The Court! A Defense Of Supreme Court Expansion." Bolding added.)

Comment was by Loren Miller on December 3, 2021 at 3:59pm

The hell of it is, Stephen, justices on the court aren't SUPPOSED to bring their personal beliefs into chambers, But They DO ... and because they do and because SCOTUS is effectively answerable to no one, we're stuck with what we're stuck with.

Which makes it all the more imperative to WIN in 2022, get better control of the Senate AND the House, and (I have to say it) Pack The Fuckin' Court!!!

Comment was by Stephen Brodie on December 3, 2021 at 3:49pm

Well said Brian Tyler Cohen. For the little knowledge I have about SCOTUS It's obvious the pro-lifers have a majority on the court. This is something I don't understand either something is or isn't constitutional having a political bias shouldn't matter. 

© 2022   Created by Atheist Universe.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service