Feedback/Notes

 

Latest Activity

Mrs.B commented on Sydni Moser's group AGING ATHEISTS
"Ya old geezer!"
4 hours ago
Mrs.B commented on Loren Miller's group Quote Of The Day
"We lived on one wage, with 3 kids, & I kept track of every penny, so we knew where we stood…"
4 hours ago
Stephen Brodie commented on Loren Miller's group Quote Of The Day
"The rule of thumb should always be give women control of the family finances. I've seen this…"
5 hours ago
Stephen Brodie commented on Richard Levison's status
"Exactly Richard. Religion like most bad habits has to be taught to you very early in your life, not…"
9 hours ago
Mrs.B commented on Loren Miller's group Quote Of The Day
"Ain't dat duh troof!"
9 hours ago
Loren Miller commented on Loren Miller's group Quote Of The Day
"The bible and the church have been the greatest stumbling block in the way of women's…"
15 hours ago
Richard Levison posted a status
"Hi! A thought just popped into my mind as I entered this site.That thought is when we come out of our mother's womb we are born atheists."
17 hours ago
Mrs.B commented on Sydni Moser's group AGING ATHEISTS
"Quite a video."
21 hours ago
Mrs.B commented on Neil Weightman's group Atheist Cat Servants
"Yup, they are."
yesterday
Grinning Cat commented on Neil Weightman's group Atheist Cat Servants
"More proof cats are liquids:"
yesterday
Stephen Brodie commented on Sydni Moser's group AGING ATHEISTS
"Dave Warnock: Dying Out Loud TheThinkingAtheist"
yesterday
Stephen Brodie commented on Sydni Moser's group AGING ATHEISTS
"Good one  Mrs.B. I can remember my sister turning the menopause into a joke and…"
yesterday
Mrs.B commented on Julien's group The Music Box
"Powerful, Loren."
yesterday
Mrs.B commented on Julien's group The Music Box
"Brazil, & Canada."
yesterday
Loren Miller commented on Julien's group The Music Box
"I am a big fan of most symphonic works for organ and orchestra.  A few years ago, I…"
yesterday
Loren Miller commented on Loren Miller's group Quote Of The Day
"Defend the right of all or surrender your own first. If you think your freedom includes the…"
yesterday
Stephen Brodie commented on Julien's group The Music Box
"Mrs.B that Beethoven 5th Symphony video is cleverly done "
yesterday
Richard Levison left a comment for William Jade
"Hello William! Its nice to see and meet you here.Welcome to the website!"
yesterday
Stephen Brodie commented on Julien's group The Music Box
"The whole world is singing the old English sea shanty The Wellerman. Who Sang It Better: The…"
yesterday
Stephen Brodie commented on Hope's group Imagine No Organized Religion
"Qonspiracy Warehouse How do big conspiracy theories come about? Here's a look at how the…"
Wednesday

We are a worldwide social network of freethinkers, atheists, agnostics and secular humanists.

The Speed(s) of a Wave

The Speed(s) of a Wave

Posted on: August 19, 2009 10:00 AM, by Matt Springer from Built on Facts

http://scienceblogs.com/builtonfacts/2009/08/the_speeds_of_a_wave.php

 

All right, the answer to yesterday's question about the maximum speed of a stadium wave, as many commenters rightly said, is "as fast as you want." The comments went into some depth on this, and I like the way Zifnab put it:

I mean, if you've got two independent agents doing their thing, the "speed" between the two just gets faster the farther apart they are. But if they have no relation to one another... what are we even asking? If our imaginary stadium is the size of the Milky Way Galaxy and the seats are stars and you stand up on Alpha Centari and I stand up on the Sun less than 4 years later, have we violated the speed of light? I mean, that just seems silly.

Exactly, a "wave" in and of itself isn't anything in particular other than an abstract concept. Stand outside, take a laser pointer, and wiggle the beam across the surface of the moon very fast. There's no limit on how fast the spot can travel relative to the surface of the moon. Nothing is actually moving. People do get suspicious of this, and I can understand. If nothing can go faster than light, what exactly counts as a "thing"? Isn't that a little sketchy?

 

The key is that the statement "nothing can go faster than light" is itself shorthand for a more precise concept. The concept is the relationship between cause and effect, or causality. Under the theory of relativity, we can take the concept of causality to say that whatever happens right here and now can only affect something else at a distance d if d < t/c. That is, whatever you do now only affects other places after enough time has gone by to at least let light get to those places. So if everyone's seated in our fictitious giant stadium and I start the wave in a normal way, it can't go faster than light. What I do can't affect the rest of the stadium any faster than the light travel time. But if I'm clever and pre-arrange standing times throughout the stadium I can get the wave to go faster than light. There's no problem because the my effect (the synchronizing message) propagated more slowly than light. No one is affecting anyone else at a distance greater than t/c. Once the superluminal wave starts there's no way I can change my mind and stop it because my "stop" signal can't travel faster than light.

 

You'll sometimes hear this stated as "information can't travel faster than light". That's true as far as it goes, but also runs the risk of being vague as to what information is. The causality formulation is probably more clear. Not perfectly clear, but more clear.

 

Also interesting is the fact that we're talking about waves, and the whole concept of "speed" with regard to waves is just wacky. There's at least three different and important ways of assigning a speed to a wave. Let's take a graphic from Wikipedia:

 

Wave_group.gif

 

This is a wave composed of a number (probably two) of different sine waves superimposed on top of each other. They interfere to some extent, and the result of this interference is that the overall wave consists of a train of pulses which are large compared to the wavelengths of the original sine waves. One of the ways of describing the velocity of this wave is the phase velocity. That's the velocity of the original component sine waves. You can track this speed by looking at the red dot.

 

But you can also look at the speed of the pulses. That's called the group velocity, and you can track that speed by looking at the green dots. The group velocity and the phase velocity are not the same in general. In a vacuum both velocities are just the speed of light, but in a material with a refractive index they usually won't be.

 

Either of those velocities can be greater than c under certain circumstances. What's not possible is to violate the causality rule. I can construct a faster-than-light group of laser light in material, but only if my laser has been shining long enough to get the "pre-arranged" waves distributed properly throughout the material in the first place. And that I can only do at or below the speed of light. This signal velocity is a third way of defining wave velocity. Signal velocity describes the causal connection of a wave with its environment, and can't be faster than c under any circumstance.

 

As a last bit of lagniappe, light waves of different wavelengths tend to have different phase velocities when traveling through matter. This has the effect of spreading out a pulse made of different frequencies. Such an effect is called dispersion. Mainly it's an excuse to post this graphic, which I've made as a brief explanatory "look, dispersion!" graphic for a funding presentation my group is doing. (For the record, it's not intended to be technically precise. Units are arbitrary, absorption is glossed over.)

 

testanimation.gif

 

Whew. That's a lot of post. Time for other work now!

© 2021   Created by Atheist Universe.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service