Feedback/Notes

 

Latest Activity

Randall Smith commented on Hope's group Imagine No Organized Religion or at least a Religion without Scump
"Indiana dark purple? That can't be right! I should know--I live there."
3 hours ago
Chris B commented on Sydni Moser's group Coffee Break without any Mention of that Idiot
"Short interview with Margaret Atwood on Dutch TV. Gentle intelligent answers. She is quick and wide…"
4 hours ago
Loren Miller commented on Loren Miller's group Quote Of The Day
"The only position that leaves me with no cognitive dissonance is atheism. It is not a creed. Death…"
5 hours ago
Ian Mason commented on Sydni Moser's group Coffee Break without any Mention of that Idiot
"You're still enjoying life to the full, I see Joan.  Elna has a great-grandson, Louis…"
7 hours ago
Joan Denoo commented on Sydni Moser's group Coffee Break without any Mention of that Idiot
"Ian, you adapt quickly to changing situations and I like the examples you and Elna share. I am also…"
9 hours ago
Mrs.B commented on Sydni Moser's group Coffee Break without any Mention of that Idiot
"Williams Lake is still ok, but the bigger centers are beginning the second round."
10 hours ago
Chris B commented on Sydni Moser's group Coffee Break without any Mention of that Idiot
"Are you also in a high-risk area? We're having the second wave..."
10 hours ago
Mrs.B commented on Sydni Moser's group Coffee Break without any Mention of that Idiot
"It's important to stay safe now."
10 hours ago
Ian Mason commented on Sydni Moser's group Coffee Break without any Mention of that Idiot
"It's good to be back. Concerts etc. are very restricted at the moment so I'm introducing…"
10 hours ago
Chris B commented on Sydni Moser's group Coffee Break without any Mention of that Idiot
"Hi Ian, good to see you!"
10 hours ago
Joan Denoo commented on Sydni Moser's group Coffee Break without any Mention of that Idiot
"I am happy to see you here, Ian, and look forward to learning more of your adventures, attending…"
11 hours ago
Mrs.B commented on Loren Miller's blog post Oppose the Appointment of Amy Coney Barrett
"Excellent letter, Loren."
13 hours ago
Mrs.B commented on Sydni Moser's group Coffee Break without any Mention of that Idiot
"Yes, Joan had mentioned she had been in touch with you. Pleased you've joined us."
14 hours ago
Ian Mason commented on Sydni Moser's group Coffee Break without any Mention of that Idiot
"Hello all. Thanks to Joan for pointing me in this direction."
14 hours ago
Ian Mason joined Sydni Moser's group
Thumbnail

Coffee Break without any Mention of that Idiot

Stop by with you cup of coffee, shoot the breeze, take a break and just unwind. Have a good joke to…See More
14 hours ago
Loren Miller and Ian Mason are now friends
14 hours ago
Ian Mason posted a status
"It's good to be here. I'm going to learn to navigate the site."
14 hours ago
Loren Miller commented on Loren Miller's blog post Oppose the Appointment of Amy Coney Barrett
"@Paul - I'll say this for former Minnesota Governor Jesse Ventura: he is an atheist!  Oh,…"
15 hours ago
Mrs.B commented on Hope's group Imagine No Organized Religion or at least a Religion without Scump
"Seeing 2 or 3 shades of dark purple country wide would be good."
15 hours ago
Doone commented on Hope's group Imagine No Organized Religion or at least a Religion without Scump
"datarep:State-level population shares reporting no religious... http://dlvr.it/RhQfbK"
16 hours ago

We are a worldwide social network of freethinkers, atheists, agnostics and secular humanists.

The Speed(s) of a Wave

The Speed(s) of a Wave

Posted on: August 19, 2009 10:00 AM, by Matt Springer from Built on Facts

http://scienceblogs.com/builtonfacts/2009/08/the_speeds_of_a_wave.php

 

All right, the answer to yesterday's question about the maximum speed of a stadium wave, as many commenters rightly said, is "as fast as you want." The comments went into some depth on this, and I like the way Zifnab put it:

I mean, if you've got two independent agents doing their thing, the "speed" between the two just gets faster the farther apart they are. But if they have no relation to one another... what are we even asking? If our imaginary stadium is the size of the Milky Way Galaxy and the seats are stars and you stand up on Alpha Centari and I stand up on the Sun less than 4 years later, have we violated the speed of light? I mean, that just seems silly.

Exactly, a "wave" in and of itself isn't anything in particular other than an abstract concept. Stand outside, take a laser pointer, and wiggle the beam across the surface of the moon very fast. There's no limit on how fast the spot can travel relative to the surface of the moon. Nothing is actually moving. People do get suspicious of this, and I can understand. If nothing can go faster than light, what exactly counts as a "thing"? Isn't that a little sketchy?

 

The key is that the statement "nothing can go faster than light" is itself shorthand for a more precise concept. The concept is the relationship between cause and effect, or causality. Under the theory of relativity, we can take the concept of causality to say that whatever happens right here and now can only affect something else at a distance d if d < t/c. That is, whatever you do now only affects other places after enough time has gone by to at least let light get to those places. So if everyone's seated in our fictitious giant stadium and I start the wave in a normal way, it can't go faster than light. What I do can't affect the rest of the stadium any faster than the light travel time. But if I'm clever and pre-arrange standing times throughout the stadium I can get the wave to go faster than light. There's no problem because the my effect (the synchronizing message) propagated more slowly than light. No one is affecting anyone else at a distance greater than t/c. Once the superluminal wave starts there's no way I can change my mind and stop it because my "stop" signal can't travel faster than light.

 

You'll sometimes hear this stated as "information can't travel faster than light". That's true as far as it goes, but also runs the risk of being vague as to what information is. The causality formulation is probably more clear. Not perfectly clear, but more clear.

 

Also interesting is the fact that we're talking about waves, and the whole concept of "speed" with regard to waves is just wacky. There's at least three different and important ways of assigning a speed to a wave. Let's take a graphic from Wikipedia:

 

Wave_group.gif

 

This is a wave composed of a number (probably two) of different sine waves superimposed on top of each other. They interfere to some extent, and the result of this interference is that the overall wave consists of a train of pulses which are large compared to the wavelengths of the original sine waves. One of the ways of describing the velocity of this wave is the phase velocity. That's the velocity of the original component sine waves. You can track this speed by looking at the red dot.

 

But you can also look at the speed of the pulses. That's called the group velocity, and you can track that speed by looking at the green dots. The group velocity and the phase velocity are not the same in general. In a vacuum both velocities are just the speed of light, but in a material with a refractive index they usually won't be.

 

Either of those velocities can be greater than c under certain circumstances. What's not possible is to violate the causality rule. I can construct a faster-than-light group of laser light in material, but only if my laser has been shining long enough to get the "pre-arranged" waves distributed properly throughout the material in the first place. And that I can only do at or below the speed of light. This signal velocity is a third way of defining wave velocity. Signal velocity describes the causal connection of a wave with its environment, and can't be faster than c under any circumstance.

 

As a last bit of lagniappe, light waves of different wavelengths tend to have different phase velocities when traveling through matter. This has the effect of spreading out a pulse made of different frequencies. Such an effect is called dispersion. Mainly it's an excuse to post this graphic, which I've made as a brief explanatory "look, dispersion!" graphic for a funding presentation my group is doing. (For the record, it's not intended to be technically precise. Units are arbitrary, absorption is glossed over.)

 

testanimation.gif

 

Whew. That's a lot of post. Time for other work now!

© 2020   Created by Atheist Universe.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service