Feedback/Notes

 

Latest Activity

Chris B commented on Adriana's group Freethought and Funny Bones
"Here we have something called kinderpindakaas - child peanut butter - but not one child in the jar!…"
15 minutes ago
Mrs.B commented on Adriana's group Freethought and Funny Bones
"Which still sounds like a mistake in labeling."
54 minutes ago
Mrs.B commented on Doone's group Humans of Earth News
"He also had a lot of health issues."
55 minutes ago
Stephen Brodie commented on Doone's group Humans of Earth News
"Larry King: US talk show host dies weeks after testing positive for COVID-19 King's career…"
1 hour ago
Stephen Brodie commented on Adriana's group Freethought and Funny Bones
"True. But in this case, a pack of four muffins labelled with pictures of blueberries. Ones I had a…"
1 hour ago
Ruth Anthony-Gardner commented on Adriana's group Freethought and Funny Bones
"No shock. Try examining Temptations cat treat ingredients. Salmon with no salmon, beef with no…"
1 hour ago
Mrs.B commented on Sydni Moser's group Coffee Break
"Well we have none this year."
2 hours ago
Mrs.B commented on Adriana's group Freethought and Funny Bones
"Sounds to me like the thing was mislabeled."
2 hours ago
Stephen Brodie commented on Sydni Moser's group Coffee Break
"They are predicting heavy snow showers for tomorrow(Sunday) over much of England and perhaps even…"
2 hours ago
Stephen Brodie commented on Adriana's group Freethought and Funny Bones
"That sounds good, but to not find a trace of fruit is just ridiculous "
3 hours ago
Mrs.B commented on Adriana's group Freethought and Funny Bones
"When I make blueberry muffins, I always add more fruit than called for....same with pancakes."
4 hours ago
Stephen Brodie commented on Adriana's group Freethought and Funny Bones
"What's a blueberry muffin called that has no             …"
4 hours ago
Mrs.B commented on Adriana's group Freethought and Funny Bones
"Yes, but we also have a lot of the British words here too."
4 hours ago
Stephen Brodie commented on Adriana's group Freethought and Funny Bones
"It is strange how words can change from one English speaking country to another."
4 hours ago
Mrs.B commented on Adriana's group Freethought and Funny Bones
"I never know how it started. We say both here in Canada."
4 hours ago
Stephen Brodie commented on Adriana's group Freethought and Funny Bones
"I wasn't being pedantic about the different pronunciations. In most of the UK, we say…"
4 hours ago
Mrs.B commented on Adriana's group Freethought and Funny Bones
5 hours ago
Grinning Cat commented on Adriana's group Freethought and Funny Bones
"I know, on the two sides of the Atlantic we're divided by a common language. :)"
7 hours ago
Mrs.B replied to Loren Miller's discussion Marlon Craft - State Of The Union in the group The Music Box
"Pretty damn good."
9 hours ago
Mrs.B replied to Loren Miller's discussion Excuse Our Coups! (Betty Bowers) in the group Freethought and Funny Bones
"She does these so well!"
9 hours ago

We are a worldwide social network of freethinkers, atheists, agnostics and secular humanists.

Scientific American has never endorsed a presidential candidate in its 175-year history. This year we are compelled to do so. We do not do this lightly.

The evidence and the science show that Donald Trump has badly damaged the U.S. and its people—because he rejects evidence and science. The most devastating example is his dishonest and inept response to the COVID-19 pandemic, which cost more than 190,000 Americans their lives by the middle of September. He has also attacked environmental protections, medical care, and the researchers and public science agencies that help this country prepare for its greatest challenges. That is why we urge you to vote for Joe Biden, who is offering fact-based plans to protect our health, our economy and the environment. These and other proposals he has put forth can set the country back on course for a safer, more prosperous and more equitable future.

Read the rest here.


=========================================


Science journals are scrupulously apolitical, roughly 99.999% of the time, mostly because politics and science ordinarily should have very little to do with each other. Up until the advent of the Trump administration, that has been true for the large portion. However, with the current administration's denial of climate science and dismissal of anthropogenic climate change, maltreatment of medical issues, particularly relating to the current coronavirus pandemic, and general ignorance of scientific principles in favor of its own misguided opinions, it would appear as though SA can no longer remain silent in the face of such behavior.

And considering their nearly-two-century abstention from such endorsements, that they choose to do so now should indicate the gravity which which they see the current situation and the need for it to be fully and honestly addressed.

Views: 39

Replies to This Discussion

As you can feel in Scientific Americans statement it's taken a lot of BS from Trump for them to endorse Joe Biden.

BS more in the form of ignoring the input of qualified scientists and researchers than anything else, I suspect.  Trump likes to shoot his mouth off, both to dominate the discussion and appear to know something no one else does.  The problem with that is doing so in the age of the internet, where bullshit both religious and political can be debunked in the time it takes to do a Google search.

Trump hasn't caught up to that truism yet, and it's liable to cost him.

Trouble is the internet can be used to debunk lies if you go to the right sites.

Trump supporters only speak amongst themselves.

True.  Things such as the SA endorsement of Biden won't move Trump's base (hell, most of them likely never even HEARD of Scientific American!).  Independent voters, though, may be an entirely separate kettle of fish, and THEY can be swayed.

I really do hope so.

And many more Biden voters than Trump voters are likely to vote by absentee or mail or advance ballots -- and it will take time to count all those votes, with quite a few states not even starting until Election Day.

Partial results that same night will be meaningless, even if they seem to give Trump a landslide.

This Biden voter will vote in person on Election Day. That has been my tradition for as long as I've been able to do so, and I will make no exception this November 3rd.

Here in the UK we still use the Good old lead pencil to put your next to the candidate of choice. Primitive I know; but very hard for anything to go wrong.

The candidates agents are present at the count to make sure nothing goes wrong. We've had suggestions over the years to change and modernise the voting system but people resist tht 

As it happens, Stephen, Ohio currently uses scanned paper ballots, where filled-in circles (generally with pen!) indicate our votes, and I vastly prefer that method to any fully electronic system.  Perhaps 30 years ago, I recall using a computer terminal to vote ONCE, and I didn't care for it at all.  Apparently, no one else did, either, because that system was abandoned.

Sometimes, the "old" ways are the best ways!

The ways with paper ballots are, given current knowledge and technology, the only acceptably secure ways. You have a tangible record of each voter's intent, not vulnerable to mass hacking; you can do risk-limiting audits to measure confidence in the reported results; and you can recount all the ballots, by hand if necessary.

RSS

© 2021   Created by Atheist Universe.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service