Feedback/Notes

 

Latest Activity

Mrs.B replied to Andy Stout's discussion Magats in the meat... The cure may have arrived!
"Back to the hidden back alley abortions, self abortion, female suicides, moving out of…"
1 hour ago
Mrs.B commented on Loren Miller's group Quote Of The Day
"They want their intercourse, but then deny a pregnancy result as not theirs, could be…"
1 hour ago
Andy Stout posted a discussion

Magats in the meat... The cure may have arrived!

The demise of the USA appears to be inevitable. The "red meat" of this nation is "rotten" (full of…See More
5 hours ago
Chris B commented on Loren Miller's group Quote Of The Day
"It makes me so angry!"
6 hours ago
Loren Miller commented on Loren Miller's group Quote Of The Day
"If men could get pregnant, abortion would be a sacrament. -- Gloria Steinem But men can't get…"
7 hours ago
RichardtheRaelian commented on Janamdin Badhai's blog post Happy Birthday Wishes for Best Friends, Family 2022
"Have a happy Atheist birthday!"
15 hours ago
Mrs.B commented on Sydni Moser's group Coffee Break
"He's so good to listen to."
20 hours ago
Mrs.B commented on Doone's group Humans of Earth News
"That all sounds good, but it doesn't seem to help things now."
20 hours ago
Doone commented on Doone's group Humans of Earth News
"I saw this from…"
20 hours ago
Doone commented on Doone's group Humans of Earth News
"I have been following along from my email account but I should start commenting more.  "
20 hours ago
Mrs.B commented on Doone's group Humans of Earth News
"Hi Doone, long time no see."
21 hours ago
Doone commented on Doone's group Humans of Earth News
"The USA gives Banana Republics a bad name "
21 hours ago
Stephen Brodie commented on Sydni Moser's group Coffee Break
"James O'Brien schools Leave voter who asks him to stop mentioning Brexit | LBC"
22 hours ago
Stephen Brodie commented on Doone's group Humans of Earth News
"It's a superpower acting like a banana republic. It breaks my heart. "
22 hours ago
Mrs.B commented on Doone's group Humans of Earth News
"I just read that headline on my phone.....look out dark ages, here you come."
yesterday
Mrs.B commented on Loren Miller's group Quote Of The Day
"That gawd thing needs to clean up the mess & do some preventions."
yesterday
Loren Miller commented on Doone's group Humans of Earth News
"Make it official (and officious!): The Supreme Court of the United States has overturned Roe v…"
yesterday
Loren Miller commented on Loren Miller's group Quote Of The Day
"Stephen, I see it as being part and parcel of their indoctrination, as well as their attempt to…"
yesterday
Stephen Brodie commented on Loren Miller's group Quote Of The Day
" Loren I truly never understand it when people say they perceive god in the world around…"
yesterday
Loren Miller commented on Loren Miller's group Quote Of The Day
"I hear and behold God in every object, yet understand God not in the least, Nor do I understand who…"
yesterday

We are a worldwide social network of freethinkers, atheists, agnostics and secular humanists.

After that debate between Tzortzis and Lawrence Krauss that was overshadowed by the disgraceful anti-egalitarian exhibition of Muslim misogyny, iERA is now trying a new tactic: they’re releasing tiny snippets of the debate that they believe they can spin into anti-Krauss sentiment. Here’s a perfect example, Krauss’s reply to a question about the morality of incest.

The audience gasped when Krauss said it’s not clear to him that incest is wrong, and then he went on to argue that there are biological and societal reasons why incest is not a good idea, but that he’d be willing to listen to rational arguments for sexual and emotional interactions between siblings, for instance…not that he’d encourage such behavior. It’s a nuanced and complicated reply in too short a time, but otherwise, he’s not wrong.

But you know what Tzortzis is thinking: this is a perfect clip to play to the dogmatic mob, his people, who don’t do complicated and nuanced, and don’t care about rational arguments, only absolute dictates.

I’d add two other arguments that might sink in.

One is that religions also rationalize incest. Here’s the Protestant Christian example:

Since Eve was made from one of Adam’s ribs [Genesis 2:21-22], she would have been a clone of Adam and, had there been any genetic mutation in Adam, this would have been reproduced in Eve and expressed in their offspring. However, we may reasonably conclude that there were no mutations, and the very first commandment given to them was “to be fruitful and multiply” [Genesis 1:28]. However, the business at the tree of the knowledge of good and evil took place long before there were any children.

The account then continues where God confronted the guilty pair at the tree, but they did not confess their guilt or plead for forgiveness [Genesis 3:1-13]. God then cursed the serpent, imposed reproductive difficulties upon Eve and “cursed the ground for [Adam's] sake” [Genesis 3:17]. From that moment, everything that Adam – and mankind since – ate had grown in the cursed ground. Cell by living cell, Adam began to very slowly change from his initial state of eternal perfection to mortal imperfection, and he finally died at the age of 930 years [Genesis 5:5]. Nevertheless, Adam and Eve’s immediate offspring would have been very close to physical perfection while brother-sister marriages were the only unions possible! Further, according to the genealogies given in Scripture, pre-flood longevity was about the same as that for Adam, so families were very large compared to those of today. Brother-sister unions were not only unavoidable, but they undoubtedly became traditional and expected.

Catholics make a similar argument.

Incest was not a problem for the immediate descendants of Adam and Eve. It became a problem when the deterioration of the gene pool meant that there was an increased likelihood that the offspring of the unions of near relatives would inherit physical or mental problems. Adam’s immediate descendants inherited perfect or nearly perfect genes, so the unions of near relatives were not a problem. Besides, near relatives were the only people who existed.

Read more here

Views: 501

Replies to This Discussion

Krauss made a mistake by thinking he was dealing with honest people!

Which is why honest communication doesn't happen anymore. Twisting someone's words or taking them out of context is more fun I guess.

I take my hat off to Krauss for not giving a simple answer to a complex moral question. Most questions about morality are complex. It is no surprise that they took this opportunity to cherry pick what he said to make him look bad. As Neal said, it's impossible to hold an honest conversation with interlocutors who are not honest themselves. 

This could be an explanation:

Hahahaha!

Hahaha!

Excellent. =)

I think Krauss could have won the debate without even saying a word.

RSS

© 2022   Created by Atheist Universe.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service