Latest Activity

Stephen Brodie posted a video

Richard Dawkins excerpts Marcus Brigstocke

From his lecture at UC Berkeley on March 8 2008.
4 hours ago
Davy left a comment for abdulrahman aliyu
5 hours ago
Davy left a comment for Mario Pinard
6 hours ago
Davy left a comment for Michael McCoy
6 hours ago
doone commented on Michel's group Internet
6 hours ago
doone commented on Michel's group Our Climate
6 hours ago
Michael McCoy and Neal are now friends
7 hours ago
Onyango Makagutu left a comment for Mario Pinard
9 hours ago
Onyango Makagutu left a comment for Michael McCoy
9 hours ago
Neal left a comment for Michael McCoy
9 hours ago
Neal replied to Bo Fowler's discussion A new argument against God?
10 hours ago
doone commented on Michel's group Our Climate
10 hours ago
doone commented on Hope's group Imagine No Religion
10 hours ago
Ali posted a video

Isolated: The Zo'é tribe (full documentary)

This series (Amazonia: Last Call) travels across Brazilian landscapes by way of one of the main links still binding the essence of humanity with the Earth: t...
11 hours ago
Profile IconMichael McCoy and Mario Pinard joined Atheist Universe
11 hours ago
Onyango Makagutu replied to Neal's discussion The Planet - June 13, 2013
11 hours ago

We are a worldwide social network of freethinkers, atheists, agnostics and secular humanists.


Welcome again to The Weekly Planet. 

Presidential Politics

How is an election won? These days it's primarily money thanks to the Citizen's United case, but there still needs to be a conversation that grabs certain blocks of voters. As an easy example, atheists will probably vote for those, that by their actions, do not take their marching orders from any religion. Actions are what you have to look for, much more so than any talk.

How any atheist can be a conservative is a mystery to me. With Santorum out, maybe they can wrap their minds around Romney, but again, if you look at his actions you'd be hard pressed to vote for him. Well, hard pressed if you care about the the rights of the women in your life. Since he changed his mind on abortion, declaring himself pro-life, or more succinctly anti-abortion, he is mimicking the religious views that the hard right base imposes. He may not be outspoken about contraceptives, but he does oppose religiously affiliated hospitals being required to provide free contraceptives. With those two small points, he has disclosed his link with the church.

Adriana posted a very interesting poll regarding atheists that I think relates to the upcoming elections as well. Besides data on the most religious and non-religious states, nationwide the percentage of people who state that religion is not an important part of their daily life and seldom or never attend religious services is 32 percent! Take that religious freaks. How this effects the election probably won't be known until after the fact. But by Obama not capitulating to the catholic church concerning contraceptives, he could possibly get as many votes as the religious right will provide for Romney.

What should be interesting as the race starts in earnest is concentrating on those who are behind the scenes. Who are those that influence the candidate's thought. This last week the NRA's board member Ted Nugent tells it like it is. Besides the discussion there's also numerous posts by doone in the Right Wing Whackos group. The gist of his comments revolve around the president and the Supreme Court Justices that he disapproves of. For the president, old Ted says he's a "vile, evil America-hating administration” which is “wiping its ass with the Constitution.” Taking it a step further, he said that “If Barack Obama becomes the president in November, again, I will either be dead or in jail by this time next year.” For the Supreme Court Justices, “We’ve got four Supreme Court justices who don’t believe in the Constitution. Does everyone here know that four of the Supreme Court justices not only determined you don’t have the right to keep and bear arms, four Supreme Court justices signed their name to a declaration that Americans have no fundamental right to self-defense.”

Keep in mind that not only has the NRA always supported the right, the hate in their rhetoric increases every election cycle. Six days ago Glenn Beck addressed the fruitcakes at the NRA's national convention. Crying Glenn said, “Barack Obama‘s winning slogan was ’Yes we can.‘ That’s the dumbest damn slogan I’ve ever heard,” Beck said. “Don’t tell me what you can do. Will you do it? Will you do it? ‘Yes we can.’ What a bunch of crap that is.”

I think liberals need to understand how the far right thinks. If you have the stomach for it, the Daily Caller has the speeches online of all your favorite mouths. Plop a couple of alka-seltzers in a shot of bourbon; only way I could take it.

Education Meets Misogyny

We are all familiar by now with the Monkey Bill in Tennessee. Another attempt to disqualify science as a whole. With all the legislative attempts to either restrict women's rights or to pervert education, it is easy to miss parts of what a particular piece of legislation is trying to accomplish.

Arizona has what has to be one of the most insidious attacks on the books; it manages to attack women and education at the same time.

We have a society that seemingly now views women, especially the poorest segments, as disposable. In Texas they have cut family planning finances, have added a sonogram bill and Planned Parenthood is being kicked out of the Medicaid program for poor women. Texas is only an example, but numerous states are cutting funds for women's health issues.

Back to Arizona, where they are not only restricting health care for women, but also using public education to promote the legislation. Arizona's new law which banns abortion after about 18 weeks is being debated by the country it would seem. But the bill also states that public schools will instruct the students on how birth and adoption is a priority over any other option. 

Isn't that the way the religious brainwash our children? Get them while their young and before they can think for themselves. It's a proven historical method that works. Not only are they restricting a person's right to control their own body, they are teaching the young to go along with the misdeed. 


Occupy The World

The Occupy movement seems to be in a funk lately. They are not getting the media's attention as they did last year; at least not yet. I guess if there's no violence from one side or another it's not worth reporting. 

The last major protests were on April 17th. Tax day for Americans. In New York they descended on Trump Tower, where goofy Donald was holding a birthday party for Anne Romney. I like the idea, they were dressed in baseball uniforms with the team name, "Tax Dodgers." 

Various protests occurred across the country, though they didn't seem to get much air time. 

The main thought of the Occupy movement is generally agreed upon to be income inequality. A longish New York Times article recently centered on two left leaning economists; Picketty and Saez. From their work archiving Internal Revenue Service data they discovered that income inequality dropped after the great depression through the seventies. After that income inequality once again was on the rise. From 2000 to 2007 they found that income rose for the bottom 90 percent rose about 4 percent after adjusting for inflation, while the top 0.1 percent incomes rose 94 percent! In 2010 the top 10 percent took half of overall income. They also stated the last time income inequality was this high was right before the great depression.

Hey Occupiers, you may want to read what they have to say.

Republicans That Don't Totally Suck

The Tea Party, the NRA and the Club for Growth are all gunning for Richard G. Lugar, a long serving United States Senator. In this country, if your a moderate conservative who supported those horrible liberal thoughts like the Dream Act, or even sometimes bipartisan supported ideas like banning earmarks, you've gone to far. With an F rating from the NRA and critiques about him being too friendly with Obama, he might have a hard primary this year. This gentleman had the audacity to work with Democratic senator Sam Dunn on a program for disarmament in the Soviet Union.

So sorry, you don't meet the crazy criteria.


Final Thought

I watched the bond hearing for Mr. Zimmerman, wanting to finally hear the man talk. After catching a couple contradictions in his testimony, I thought to myself, here's a man who's going to have trouble when the trial actually begins. 

After the hearing was over, I listened to the pundits giving their views on the case. They all seem to think that if Zimmerman can prove their was a scuffle that he could claim self-defense. I did not understand why they focused on that instead of the fact that Mr. Zimmerman followed Mr. Martin. Am I wrong in thinking that if you follow someone you are no longer defending yourself? 

The "Stand Your Ground" law will be revisited by a panel selected by FLorida's Governor. I hope that the trial is about the killing of Mr. Martin and does not revolve around defending the legislation.

I'm sure the NRA will be wielding its might protecting what they believe the second amendment means.

Should be an interesting trial.

Views: 257

Tags: atheist, news, planet, politics, the, universe, weekly

Comment

You need to be a member of Atheist Universe to add comments!

Join Atheist Universe

Comment by Neal on February 14, 2013 at 2:46pm

What’s Happened In The Trayvon Martin Case Since You Stopped Paying...

It’s been nearly a year since George Zimmerman shot and killed Trayvon Martin, an unarmed 17-year-old on his way back to his father’s townhouse. In the weeks following the shooting, the story captured the nation’s attention, culminating with Zimmerman being charged with second-degree murder last April.

But as the story has receded from the headlines, the legal case has plodded along and the trial is likely to be completed this summer. Here’s what you may have missed:

1. Zimmerman has spent over $300,000 in donations over the last year and is desperate for more funds to finance his defense.Zimmerman has “spent more than $125,000″ on living expenses — not including security — over the last year. His lawyer acknowledged that “Zimmerman’s personal spending may seem exorbitant.” Zimmerman is considering asking the court to declare him “indigent, meaning the public would have to pay for Zimmerman’s defense.” Zimmerman was also sued by a security company for unpaid bills. [Orlando Sentinel,1/20/2013; Miami Herald, 12/27/12]

2. The trial has been set for June 10. Zimmerman recently asked for a delay of the trial until November but a judge denied his request. Zimmerman’s lawyer says it is “physically impossible for us to be prepared” for trial at that time. A seperate proceeding, essentially a mini-trial, to determine whether Zimmerman is immune from prosecution due to Florida’s “Stand Your Ground” law, is scheduled for April 22. [Orlando Sentinel, 2/5/13; Headline News, 2/13/13]

3. New forensic analysis “casts doubt on Zimmerman’s timeline on the night he shot and killed the unarmed teen.” The analysis was done by “Michael Knox, a retired Jacksonville Sheriff’s Office detective and crime scene investigator.” According to Knox, “based on the times and distances Zimmerman said he covered, Zimmerman would have still been on the phone with Sanford police when he claims he was attacked by Martin.” Knox says that other aspects of Zimmerman’s story, like the claim Martin was leaning over him at the time the shot was fired, are supported by forensic evidence. [News 4 Jacksonville, 2/10/13]

4. Zimmerman has gained 105 pounds. [Orlando Sentinel, 1/20/2013]

Comment by Adriana on April 27, 2012 at 5:24pm

I just found this in Alternet. It seems the "Stand your Ground" law is applied VERY inconsistently.

Woman in Jail for Shooting at Abusive Husband: Why Didn't Stand Your Ground Laws Apply to Her?

There are major inconsistencies in applications of "Stand Your Ground" laws.
April 26, 2012  |  
 

 

Nowadays the words "Stand Your Ground" have almost become synonymous with "no fair" and "unjust," due mostly to the non-arrest of George Zimmerman the night he shot Trayvon Martin and that law that protected him up until just last week.

But the cases of John McNeil and now Marissa Alexander have highlighted the inconsistencies in the law's application.

According to a blogsite pleading her case, in 2010, Alexander found herself in a violent confrontation with her husband. Her husband already had a history of abuse towards her and other women in the past, causing Alexander to place an injunction for protection against violence on him.

On this day in particular Alexander says that her husband, unprovoked, assaulted her in the bathroom of her home. She managed to get out of his grasp and ran to her car in the garage to leave, but realized that she didn't have her keys. She was also unable to open the garage door to get out because of a mechanical malfunction.

At this point, she was very fearful for her life, but knew that she had to at least get her cell phone to call for help. That's when she grabbed a gun, for which she had a concealed weapon permit. When she walked back into the kitchen area, she saw her husband again, who was supposed to be leaving through another door with his two sons (her stepsons). When he saw her, she says he screamed "bitch, I'll kill you" and charged at her. She then pointed her weapon at the ceiling, turned her head and shot in the air. That scared her husband off.

But, he promptly called the police and told them that she shot the gun at him and his sons. She was taken to jail where she has been sitting ever since.

Alexander has been trying to use Florida's Stand Your Ground laws to defend her actions, but to no avail. A judge ruled that Alexander was actually in the wrong, saying that she could have exited to safety through one of the other doors or windows in the house instead of crossing paths with her husband in the kitchen.

"I am a law abiding citizen and I take great pride in my liberty, rights, and privileges as one," pleads Alexander on the blogsite telling her story. " I have vehemently proclaimed my innocence and my actions that day.  The enigma I face since that fateful day I was charged through trial, does the law cover and apply to me too?"

(link)

Comment by Neal on April 25, 2012 at 12:56pm

There wouldn't have been all this speculation if the police would have done their job. Make the arrest, take pictures, interview witnesses; this whole ordeal would have been prevented.

Comment by Adriana on April 25, 2012 at 8:57am

@Bill: no worries. Zimmerman will be on trial, not you :-)

I have not seen all the evidence and I don't think anybody has. It will come out in the trial. However, just like you have, I've formed my opinion (which is why I could not be a member of the jury) in this case.  INMHO, Zimmerman's version is not believable. And the police department at Sanford, Florida, appears to have a long track record of racial bias (see attached written testimony from the ACLU on this; I'm a card carrying member of the ACLU, I've been for many years, and I'm proud of it, I think they are a serious organization). Zimmerman was known to the police there, since he was calling them all the time about suspicious people, who always appear to be black. To me it is more logical to see bias on the part of the police, who showed at the very least incompetence by not arresting Zimmerman until more was known about the killing), than on the part of the ACLU or other groups claiming racial bias. The allegations of racial bias seem perfectly reasonable to me, I have no trouble believing them.

Zimmerman, like everyone else, should get a fair trial. And if he doesn't, it's not because of the media crying racism, it's because of the incompetence and possibly racial bias, on the part of the Sanford police department. I cannot help but think that if Trayvon Martin had been blond, blue-eyed Tim Martin, the treatment of Zimmerman by the police department would have been very different.

And i don't think it's worthwhile commenting any longer about this case.

Comment by Bill Stoner on April 24, 2012 at 10:58pm

@Adriana

Look, I thought I made it clear. I did not go "cherry picking" for sites. I got on Google News and searched for the picture of the back of Zimmerman's head. I found one and posted the link. When I went back to site I found the pic was on a gun advocate blog and not a news story. I thought I had enough trouble explaining my position without people thinking I was some sort of a gun nut. So I found a considerably less biased news story with the pic.  OK?

I am not a gun nut. I do not belong to the NRA. I believe the second amendment is about a militia. I firmly believe that if everyone carried a gun we wouldn't see less crime We'd see more people doing stupid things with guns. I believe if you shoot someone you should have a trial. I also believe that a man is innocent until proven guilty. I hate to see people jump to conclusions. I tend to look at the accused and wonder if this person really should be vilified. I tend to believe   people. I accept things like the police report and the pictures from ABC News at face value. I see no reason to accuse people of lying and forgery until they are proven to be liars and forgers. I don't believe that something is necessarily a fake just because it could be easily faked.  

And speaking of evidence the recording of the 911 call does not have the cry for help on it. The woman made the call because she heard the cry for help. What it does show is that there were panicked cries belonging to Trayvon right before the gun shot. OK, we have an actual piece of evidence that seems to prove at least part of Zimmerman's story is a lie. We can't be sure of everything that happened in that scuffle, but it doesn't seem like Trayvon was hitting Zimmerman's head against the ground when he was shot. And no, I do not believe the examiner lied about the results of the tests on the tape. Even though he could have, I mean how would we know? (Just kidding)

Comment by Neal on April 24, 2012 at 9:46pm

Comment by Susan Stanko on April 23, 2012 at 4:03pm

So you would rather go with Zimmerman's account of an event instead of forensic evidence?  Voice experts have listened to the 911 calls.  It wasn't Zimmerman calling for help.  He had absolutely NO wounds on his head.  If Trayvon was on top of him the only way Zimmerman could get to his gun is by overpowering Trayvon.  Which would have rendered his need for the gun moot.

Comment by Adriana on April 23, 2012 at 3:56pm

Best summary of the problem at hand, Neal.

Comment by Michel on April 23, 2012 at 3:51pm

I am sorry you think this is about race, I think it's about common sense.


Comment by Neal on April 23, 2012 at 3:23pm

So again Bill, Zimmerman created the incident by not stopping pursuit like the police requested he do.

Your statement, "THE SYMBOL FOR RACISM IN AMERICA" is how people are trying to hide the real problem. That and the right's constant moan about how black on black crime is not highlighted by the media. All smoke for the real problem.

That problem is that if someone kills someone they should be arrested until the facts are learned, not let go to wander the streets with a gun. That is the problem, not any of the other tricks with mirrors. It is what we expect.

I am sorry you think this is about race, I think it's about common sense. If there's a crime you go through the proper procedures and clear it up. This is about no one caring enough to even interview witnesses at the time of the crime. This is about the local law enforcement failing on all counts. 

© 2013   Created by Atheist Universe.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service