Latest Activity

National Atheist Party posted a blog post
5 minutes ago
RICHARD CARSCADDEN joined Sydni Moser's group
8 minutes ago
Onyango Makagutu commented on Hope's group Imagine No Religion
9 minutes ago
RICHARD CARSCADDEN joined Adriana's group
11 minutes ago
Onyango Makagutu commented on Onyango Makagutu's blog post Is believing in god wrong?
13 minutes ago
Dallas the Phallus replied to Dallas the Phallus's discussion The CRITICAL THINKING Repository in the group CRITICAL THINKING
3 hours ago
Dallas the Phallus commented on Dallas the Phallus's group CRITICAL THINKING
3 hours ago
Jessica Mokrzycki joined Hope's group
4 hours ago
Jessica Mokrzycki replied to Dallas the Phallus's discussion Raising a Child Without Religion, or Faith in the group Imagine No Religion
4 hours ago
Dallas the Phallus added a discussion to the group Imagine No Religion
4 hours ago
Chris replied to Chris's discussion Depressed people’s body clocks ‘out of sync’
4 hours ago
Chris commented on Onyango Makagutu's blog post Is believing in god wrong?
4 hours ago
doone commented on Dallas the Phallus's group THE NAKED APE
5 hours ago
Chris commented on Pam's group Atheist Women
5 hours ago
Jessica Mokrzycki commented on National Atheist Party's blog post Turning Point: Embracing Skepticism
5 hours ago
Don commented on Sydni Moser's group Green Gardening
5 hours ago

We are a worldwide social network of freethinkers, atheists, agnostics and secular humanists.

Information

CRITICAL THINKING

CRITICAL THINKING: Dedicated to the humble pursuit of knowledge and understanding.

Location: #philosophy
Members: 57
Latest Activity: 3 hours ago

WELCOME TO CRITICAL THINKING

Why, you may ask, did I say that this group was about the humble pursuit of knowledge and understanding? What is humble about it?


Well, the reason I wanted to create this group was because of my extreme disappointment with the lack of critical thinking around us today—even among intelligent people. This is not due to a lack of available information. It is not because of a lack of education. And it is certainly not due to a lack of rational thinking, because even ignorant people can be rational within the confines of their own mistaken beliefs.


No! It is because that in order to understand the world, and even to understand ourselves, we must first admit our ignorance. We must first admit that there are things that we do not know, that there are things that are worth learning, and that there is an inherent uncertainty in our beliefs and our perceptions.


Humility is the whetstone that sharpens our dull intellect. Intelligence is nothing without it.


The practice of critical thinking should be made in a spirit of humilty.


Here we will explore how to think. We will examine why we believe. We will challenge our assumptions.


There will undoubtedly be some crossover between this group and my other group THE NAKED APE, especially when it comes to the brain, perception, and cognition. But I think I’d like to make attempts to confine the discussions here to the methodology of thinking, and keep posts on biology and psychology on THE NAKED APE.  


Threads on woo, stupid beliefs, and other nonsense belong more appropriately to my group WHEN PIGS FLY.


Threads on cognitive biases, skeptical thinking, logical fallacies, and general knowledge and comprehension are welcome here.

ONGOING THREADS
The CRITICAL THINKING Repository
 

EXTERNAL LINKS
Critical Thinking Web
Foundation for Critical Thinking
Taxonomy of Logical Fallacies
Why Do Humans Reason? Arguments for an Argumentative Theory 

 

 

Discussion Forum

In defense of dangerous ideas

Started by Dallas the Phallus. Last reply by Heather Spoonheim Jun 29, 2011. 24 Replies

The CRITICAL THINKING Repository

Started by Dallas the Phallus. Last reply by Dallas the Phallus 3 hours ago. 23 Replies

Quora

Started by Adriana. Last reply by Adriana Mar 30. 12 Replies

Reason Seen More as Weapon Than Path to Truth

Started by Sydni Moser. Last reply by Adriana Jun 29, 2011. 11 Replies

Taxonomy of logical fallacies

Started by Adriana. Last reply by Adriana Jan 15. 10 Replies

Giving Ockham's Razor its true dimension

Started by Adriana. Last reply by Adriana May 6, 2011. 9 Replies

Sporting superstitions: Why do we have them?

Started by Dallas the Phallus. Last reply by Michel Apr 20, 2012. 5 Replies

Rapture Ready: The Science of Self Delusion

Started by Dallas the Phallus. Last reply by Dallas the Phallus May 23, 2011. 5 Replies

Religious issues

Started by Marianne. Last reply by Marianne Oct 25, 2011. 4 Replies

Reflective equilibrium

Started by Adriana. Last reply by Adriana Oct 16, 2011. 4 Replies

College Students Not Learning Critial Thinking Skills

Started by Jacob W. Andrews. Last reply by Jacob W. Andrews Apr 7, 2011. 4 Replies

What is Schema?

Started by Dallas the Phallus. Last reply by Dallas the Phallus Mar 23, 2011. 4 Replies

Comment Wall

Comment

You need to be a member of CRITICAL THINKING to add comments!

Comment by Dallas the Phallus on April 29, 2012 at 10:04pm

I think Cracked.com is my favorite website:

 

5 Creepy Forms of Mind Control You're Exposed to Daily

 

Brainwashing Techniques They're Using On You Right Now

Comment by Dallas the Phallus on April 29, 2012 at 5:30pm

Thanks for joining us Ken.

Comment by Ken Wheeler on April 29, 2012 at 4:48pm

Thanks, Dallas, for the book suggestion. I dl'ed an audio version and will give it a listen soon. Love the dog riddle as well. Am going to spread that one to a few friends and associates.

Comment by Adriana on April 29, 2012 at 9:20am

That book is on my list, too :-)

Comment by Dallas the Phallus on April 28, 2012 at 6:45pm

Another book to read:

 

The Invisible Gorilla: How Our Intuitions Deceive Us

Reading this book will make you less sure of yourself—and that’s a good thing. In The Invisible Gorilla, Christopher Chabris and Daniel Simons, creators of one of psychology’s most famous experiments, use remarkable stories and counterintuitive scientific findings to demonstrate an important truth: Our minds don’t work the way we think they do. We think we see ourselves and the world as they really are, but we’re actually missing a whole lot. Chabris and Simons combine the work of other researchers with their own findings on attention, perception, memory, and reasoning to reveal how faulty intuitions often get us into trouble. In the process, they explain:

• Why a company would spend billions to launch a product that its own analysts know will fail

• How a police officer could run right past a brutal assault without seeing it

• Why award-winning movies are full of editing mistakes

• What criminals have in common with chess masters

• Why measles and other childhood diseases are making a comeback

• Why money managers could learn a lot from weather forecasters

 

Again and again, we think we experience and understand the world as it is, but our thoughts are beset by everyday illusions. We write traffic laws and build criminal cases on the assumption that people will notice when something unusual happens right in front of them. We’re sure we know where we were on 9/11, falsely believing that vivid memories are seared into our minds with perfect fidelity. And as a society, we spend billions on devices to train our brains because we’re continually tempted by the lure of quick fixes and effortless self-improvement. 

The Invisible Gorilla reveals the myriad ways that our intuitions can deceive us, but it’s much more than a catalog of human failings. Chabris and Simons explain why we succumb to these everyday illusions and what we can do to inoculate ourselves against their effects. Ultimately, the book provides a kind of x-ray vision into our own minds, making it possible to pierce the veil of illusions that clouds our thoughts and to think clearly for perhaps the first time.  

Comment by doone on March 9, 2012 at 3:56pm

The mind is a guess

My recent Beyond Boundaries column for the latestissue of The Psychologist explores how the idea of the ‘mind’ as a single distinct concept is an assumption that many cultures don’t share.

I’d like to talk about people who don’t have minds. This isn’t going to be one of those ingenious philosophy arguments where I claim that we’re all zombies, nor a smug assertion that we’re just a bunch of neurons, but a brief visit to people who genuinely don’t have minds – at least not as we understand them.

The idea that the self can be split into body and mind is at the root of psychology, but there is no laboratory test, questionnaire or brain scan that tells us this – it is a product of our culture. In fact, we inherited the notion from the Ancient Greeks and it has stuck with us because we find it convenient (presumably, a bit like stuffed vine leaves). If you’re not sure how we can possibly think about ourselves without thinking about the mind, it will be easier, perhaps, to briefly touch upon other forms of psychology where the mind does not exist in the form we understand it.

In traditional Haitian culture, there is no direct equivalent of the mind. The self is made up of a three components. Thecorps cadavre is the physical body; the ti-bon anj or ‘little good angel’ loosely represents what we would consider as agency, awareness and memory; while the gwo bon anj or the ‘big good angel’ is the animating principle that manages motivation and movement. Incidentally, a traditional Haitian zombie is created when a sorcerer steals the ‘little good angel’ leaving a coordinated body capable of understanding and following instructions but without reflective thought, clearly demonstrating a split where we see a single mental realm.

The traditional Javanese concept of the self, a synthesis of many Eastern influences, is even more complex. Humans consist of the selira or body which is the source of physical desires. The organic structure is kept active and alive by theatma (energy), the kama (sensory desire), and the prana(vital principle). Unlike other beings, humans also havemanas (deliberate thinking), manasa (intellect) and jiwa(immortal essence).

We often assume that understanding other cultures is about comprehending how other people ‘think’ about the world, when many other cultures do not even have an equivalent concept of the mind. Consequently, Western psychology is about as culturally neutral as Coca Cola.

Thanks to Jon Sutton, editor of The Psychologist who has kindly agreed for me to publish my column on Mind Hacks as long as I include the following text:

The Psychologist is sent free to all members of the British Psychological Society (you can join here), or you can subscribe as a non-member by goinghere.
 

Link to column in The Psychologist.

Comment by doone on February 29, 2012 at 6:51pm

Feb. 29, 2012

homework class test - Internet Commentology 235: U Mad Bro?


That concludes today’s lesson on Internet Commentology. For homework, go out and try not to hurt anyone’s feelings. –Dr. Prof. Nick, Ph.D, M.D., Esq.

Comment by Michel on January 18, 2012 at 6:05pm

Learning how to read, learning how to write, learning how to count, learning how to think. The four R's.

Comment by Michel on January 18, 2012 at 1:21pm
FYI:
Skepticism 101 in the Classroom (A Pilot Course)

This fall semester (2011) Michael Shermer has been teaching a course for Freshmen at Chapman University entitled Skepticism 101: How to Think like a Scientist (Without Being a Geek). In the course, students are instructed to:

  • write a 700-word OpEd essay,
  • deliver an 18-minute TED talk, and
  • conduct an experiment testing a paranormal claim,
  • read many classic skeptical books,
  • attend lectures by Dr. Shermer on classic skeptical topics such as: science and pseudoscience • science and religion • science and morality • evolution and creationism • the Baloney Detection Kit • how science works • Big Foot and Loch Ness, aliens and UFOs, Bermuda Triangle and Atlantis, etc.

Shermer’s Skepticism 101 course is a pilot course for the development of a Skeptical Studies Curriculum that can be used in any classroom anywhere in the world, from middle school to high schools, and community colleges to universities.

We’re Making Skepticism 101 Available to the World

Your donations will help us build a free, comprehensive online resource center dedicated to skeptical studies available online to anyone, anywhere, anytime, including:

  • syllabi, reading lists, articles
  • essays, lectures and notes, PowerPoint/Keynote presentations
  • videos, YouTube links, educational and entertaining in-class demonstrations on how to teach skeptical principles and the psychology behind them with hands-on experiences
  • other teaching tools that visually illustrate key points of skeptical thinking on how science works and how thinking goes wrong.

----------------------------

More HERE

Comment by Chris on January 13, 2012 at 8:07pm

Is there a Scientific Reason Many Conservatives Hate Science?

By Chris Mooney, Huffington Post
Posted on January 11, 2012, Printed on January 13, 2012
http://www.alternet.org/story/153736/is_there_a_scientific_reason_m...

Last week, we went through a familiar ritual: Hand-wringing and alarm over Republican politicians denying scientific reality. This time around, the main focus was Rick Santorum, the anti-evolutionist and climate change denier who is one of the worst of the worst in this area (and who promptly obliged by making a new and fresh anti-science statement).

But hey, it's always something.

We've been repeating this pattern at least since the early George W. Bush years. A Republican makes a dubious scientific claim, a Republican officeholder or appointee suppresses a scientific report, a scientist in a Republican administration gets muzzled...the names change, but the story does not. I chronicled it all in a book that is now seven years old--The Republican War on Science--and I wasn't the first. More Here.

 
 
 

© 2013   Created by Atheist Universe.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service