
Neal replied to Dallas the Phallus's discussion The Random Music & Music Video Thread in the group The Music Box
Chris replied to doone's discussion Buzzfeed/11 Things Everyone Thinks Are In The Bible, But Aren'tWe are a worldwide social network of freethinkers, atheists, agnostics and secular humanists.
THE NAKED APE: Exploring the science and cultural evolution of human psychology, behavior, cognition, language, memory, intelligence, emotion, and consciousness. (Uh, did I miss anything?)
Location: #science
Members: 53
Latest Activity: 17 hours ago
Those who’ve know me for some time know that I have a moderately strong interest in human consciousness and psychology. Although mind and body cannot exist without one another – and indeed they shape one another – it does seem that the very core of the human experience of ‘self’ exists in the brain alone.
We all know that much of the functioning and maintenance of our body is controlled covertly by the brain or by biological systems that work beneath our threshold of awareness. We do not consciously decide to sweat, or digest our food, or replace our cells.
And yet, in spite of the fact that we know this, we still cling to the illusion that the functioning of our thoughts, our decisions, our perceptions, our preferences, our memories, and our reasoning are under our direct, conscious control.
But neuroscience and psychology are now showing us that this simply is not the case—that the processes of mind and awareness function just as covertly as our biological systems.
That fascinates me!
How is it that the mind – that place of concealment – is also the one place in which awareness itself is known to exist?
The truth is that we don’t know ourselves as well as we’d like to believe. We don’t control our decisions, our perceptions, our motivations, or our memories as well as we think we do.
THE NAKED APE was created to explore these important topics. I welcome any post on human psychology, behavior, cognition, perception, language, memory, intelligence, emotion, and consciousness.
Started by Michel. Last reply by Chris May 6. 1 Reply 0 Likes
Started by Michel. Last reply by Dallas the Phallus May 5. 3 Replies 0 Likes
Started by Neal. Last reply by Adriana Mar 20. 13 Replies 0 Likes
Started by Adriana. Last reply by Adriana Feb 6. 6 Replies 1 Like
Started by Michel. Last reply by Adriana Jan 31. 2 Replies 0 Likes
Started by Michel. Last reply by Marianne Jan 19. 2 Replies 0 Likes
Started by Dallas the Phallus. Last reply by Michel Jan 2. 6 Replies 1 Like
Started by Adriana. Last reply by Adriana Dec 19, 2012. 4 Replies 1 Like
Started by Michel. Last reply by Adriana Dec 19, 2012. 1 Reply 0 Likes
Started by Dallas the Phallus. Last reply by Adriana Dec 2, 2012. 3 Replies 2 Likes
Comment

Comment by doone on June 13, 2012 at 11:15am Jonah Lehrer in The New Yorker:
Here’s a simple arithmetic question: A bat and ball cost a dollar and ten cents. The bat costs a dollar more than the ball. How much does the ball cost?
The vast majority of people respond quickly and confidently, insisting the ball costs ten cents. This answer is both obvious and wrong. (The correct answer is five cents for the ball and a dollar and five cents for the bat.)
For more than five decades, Daniel Kahneman, a Nobel Laureate and professor of psychology at Princeton, has been asking questions like this and analyzing our answers. His disarmingly simple experiments have profoundly changed the way we think about thinking. While philosophers, economists, and social scientists had assumed for centuries that human beings are rational agents—reason was our Promethean gift—Kahneman and his scientific partner, the late Amos Tversky, demonstrated that we’re not nearly as rational as we like to believe.
When people face an uncertain situation, they don’t carefully evaluate the information or look up relevant statistics. Instead, their decisions depend on a long list of mental shortcuts, which often lead them to make foolish decisions. These shortcuts aren’t a faster way of doing the math; they’re a way of skipping the math altogether. Asked about the bat and the ball, we forget our arithmetic lessons and instead default to the answer that requires the least mental effort.
More here.
Posted by Abbas Raza at 09:41 AM | Permalink

Comment by Neal on June 13, 2012 at 11:13am I don't think it applies to getting old, I think it applies to being happy at any age.

Comment by Michel on June 13, 2012 at 9:39am Well, I've never heard of that: young people heeding what the old say about getting old...

Comment by Adriana on June 13, 2012 at 9:19am Yes, I agree, it should be its own discussion. It could be useful for young people to realize what will happen if they don't learn to move on.

Comment by Neal on June 13, 2012 at 9:13am That should be a discussion so I can find it. I've seen this in my own family, some are happy as they age, some fight depression. And though only a personal observation, those that are depressed are the ones who hold onto ever horrid event or loss; they never move on.

Comment by Adriana on June 13, 2012 at 7:40am I couldn't agree more! Those "if only" thoughts need to be combated like the plague. Unfortunately I have people very dear to my heart who can't let go of past "missed opportunities" or even past unlucky turns and by constantly dwelling on them, and bringing them back, they make their lives miserable. We can't change the past, we need to learn to live with what we have, and love what we have, focus on the positive aspects of our lives.

Comment by doone on June 13, 2012 at 6:48am From Scientific American:
The poem “Maud Muller” by John Greenleaf Whittier aptly ends with the line, “For of all sad words of tongue or pen, The saddest are these: ‘It might have been!’” What if you had gone for the risky investment that you later found out made someone else rich, or if you had had the guts to ask that certain someone to marry you? Certainly, we’ve all had instances in our lives where hindsight makes us regret not sticking our neck out a bit more. But new research suggests that when we are older these kinds of ‘if only!’ thoughts about the choices we made may not be so good for ourmental health. One of the most important determinants of our emotional well being in our golden years might be whether we learn to stop worrying about what might have been.
In a new paper published in Science, researchers from the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf in Hamburg, Germany, report evidence from two experiments which suggest that one key to aging well might involve learning to let go of regrets about missed opportunities. Stafanie Brassen and her colleagues looked at how healthy young participants (mean age: 25.4 years), healthy older participants (65.8 years), and older participants who had developed depression for the first time later in life (65.6 years) dealt with regret, and found that the young and older depressed patients seemed to hold on to regrets about missed opportunities while the healthy older participants seemed to let them go.
More here.
Posted by Azra Raza at 06:19 AM | Permalink

Comment by doone on June 12, 2012 at 7:02pm Alex Knapp warns against over-interpreting this research:
[W]hile there may be a correlation between pathological lying and more white matter in the prefrontal cortex, it doesn’t necessarily follow that more white matter is the cause of pathological lying. In fact, the opposite could be true. Thanks to the plasticity of the brain, it may well be that the practice of frequently lying causes underlying structural changes in the brain.

Comment by doone on June 11, 2012 at 9:38am Are wired differently:
One experiment measured the brain structure of pathological liars, and compared it to normal controls — more specifically, the ratio of gray matter (the neural tissue that makes up the bulk of our brains) to white matter (the wiring that connects those brain cells). Liars, it turned out, had 14% less gray matter than the controls but had 22-26% more white matter in the prefrontal cortex, suggesting that they were more likely to make connections between different memories and ideas as increased connectivity means greater access to the reserve of associations and memories stored in gray matter. “Intelligence,” it turned out, wasn’t correlated with dishonesty — but creativity, which we already know is all about connecting things, was.

Comment by doone on June 10, 2012 at 11:21am
© 2013 Created by Atheist Universe.
Powered by
Badges | Report an Issue | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service

You need to be a member of THE NAKED APE to add comments!