Feedback and Notes

 

Imagine No Religion

Latest Activity

Tom Sarbeck replied to Chris's discussion 1918, 11/11 11:00
12 minutes ago
D L replied to D L's discussion Should Governments regulate fraudulent religions?
1 hour ago
Mike Lansing replied to D L's discussion Should Governments regulate fraudulent religions?
1 hour ago
Mrs.B commented on Hope's group Imagine No Religion, Please!
3 hours ago
Stephen commented on Hope's group Imagine No Religion, Please!
3 hours ago
Doone has Fremdschämen commented on Doone has Fremdschämen's group Canada, Mexico most of the World and Some Nutty Country Suffering from Fremdschämen about Scumpism News
5 hours ago
Chris replied to Chris's discussion 1918, 11/11 11:00
7 hours ago
Chris replied to Chris's discussion 1918, 11/11 11:00
7 hours ago
Suzanna commented on Adriana's group Freethought and Funny Bones
8 hours ago
Chris replied to Chris's discussion 1918, 11/11 11:00
8 hours ago
Chris posted a discussion
9 hours ago
Stephen commented on Adriana's group Freethought and Funny Bones
10 hours ago
Chris commented on Chris's group Right Wing Whackos who help Scump
11 hours ago
Chris commented on Chris's group Right Wing Whackos who help Scump
11 hours ago
Chris commented on Chris's group Right Wing Whackos who help Scump
12 hours ago
Chris left a comment for Zed
12 hours ago
Chris commented on Chris's group Right Wing Whackos who help Scump
12 hours ago
Chris commented on Chris's group Right Wing Whackos who help Scump
13 hours ago
Suzanna commented on A Former Member's group Animal | Vegetable | Mineral | Fungus or Scump
14 hours ago
Chris left a comment for Johny Mcgregor
14 hours ago

We are a worldwide social network of freethinkers, atheists, agnostics and secular humanists.

This is taken from the book Drunk Tank Pink, which has been on my reading list for some time. There are numerous studies to corroborate these findings--that the labels or expectations we have when assessing people greatly influences what we see or don't see in them. -- Dallas

LONG AGO, HUMANS began labeling and cataloguing each other. Eventually, lighter-skinned humans became "whites," darker-skinned humans became "blacks," and people with intermediate skin tones became "yellow-," "red-," and "brown-skinned." These labels don't reflect reality faithfully, and if you lined up 1,000 randomly selected people from across the earth, none of them would share exactly the same skin tone. Of course, the continuity of skin tone hasn't stopped humans from assigning each other to discrete categories like "black" and "white" — categories that have no basis in biology but nonetheless go on to determine the social, political, and economic well-being of their members.

These racial labels impose boundaries and categories on an infinitely complex social world, but once in place these boundaries are very difficult to dissolve. People are apt to resolve racial ambiguity by resorting to racial labels. In a Stanford University study, an experimenter showed white students a picture of a young man whose facial features made it difficult to determine whether he was white or black. For half the students, the man was labeled "white," and for the other half he was labeled "black." The students were asked to draw the image in front of them as accurately as they could. To sweeten the deal, the student who created the most accurate drawing was promised a $20 cash prize.

The ones who were told that the man was black tended to exaggerate his "typically black" features, whereas those who were told he was white did the reverse, exaggerating his "typically white" features. Although the students were looking at exactly the same photograph, they perceived the image through a lens that was tinted with the racial label that the researcher provided earlier in the experiment. [continue]

Views: 64

© 2018   Created by Atheist Universe.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service