Feedback and Notes

Latest Activity

Suzanna commented on Adriana's group Freethought and Funny Bones
4 minutes ago
Tom Sarbeck added a discussion to the group Freethought and Funny Bones
4 hours ago
Stephen left a comment for Laura zhu
11 hours ago
Stephen left a comment for Klinger
11 hours ago
Stephen left a comment for Christopher Marks
11 hours ago
Stephen commented on Adriana's group Freethought and Funny Bones
11 hours ago
Stephen commented on Stephen's group Secularism in the UK and Europe.
11 hours ago
Chris replied to Lauren Ell's discussion "Morality cannot be solely determined by secularism" in the group Republican Atheists
13 hours ago
Chris replied to Lauren Ell's discussion Terrorism is nothing new in the group Republican Atheists
13 hours ago
Chris replied to Lauren Ell's discussion Parts of Sweden are not LGBT friendly or supportive of women's rights in the group Republican Atheists
13 hours ago
Stephen commented on Doone's group 99.9999999865% of the World and President Cockroach News
14 hours ago
Chris commented on Lauren Ell's group Republican Atheists
15 hours ago
Stephen commented on Adriana's group Freethought and Funny Bones
20 hours ago
Stephen commented on Adriana's group Freethought and Funny Bones
yesterday
Stephen left a comment for Karen Gonzales
yesterday
Stephen left a comment for Edward Joseph Hammersmith
yesterday
Stephen commented on Doone's group 99.9999999865% of the World and President Cockroach News
yesterday
Stephen commented on Hope's group Imagine No Religion - How Canada Helps Atheism
yesterday
Mrs.B commented on Adriana's group Freethought and Funny Bones
yesterday
Doone commented on A Former Member's group The Family Tree of the Naked Ape
yesterday

We are a worldwide social network of freethinkers, atheists, agnostics and secular humanists.

This is taken from the book Drunk Tank Pink, which has been on my reading list for some time. There are numerous studies to corroborate these findings--that the labels or expectations we have when assessing people greatly influences what we see or don't see in them. -- Dallas

LONG AGO, HUMANS began labeling and cataloguing each other. Eventually, lighter-skinned humans became "whites," darker-skinned humans became "blacks," and people with intermediate skin tones became "yellow-," "red-," and "brown-skinned." These labels don't reflect reality faithfully, and if you lined up 1,000 randomly selected people from across the earth, none of them would share exactly the same skin tone. Of course, the continuity of skin tone hasn't stopped humans from assigning each other to discrete categories like "black" and "white" — categories that have no basis in biology but nonetheless go on to determine the social, political, and economic well-being of their members.

These racial labels impose boundaries and categories on an infinitely complex social world, but once in place these boundaries are very difficult to dissolve. People are apt to resolve racial ambiguity by resorting to racial labels. In a Stanford University study, an experimenter showed white students a picture of a young man whose facial features made it difficult to determine whether he was white or black. For half the students, the man was labeled "white," and for the other half he was labeled "black." The students were asked to draw the image in front of them as accurately as they could. To sweeten the deal, the student who created the most accurate drawing was promised a $20 cash prize.

The ones who were told that the man was black tended to exaggerate his "typically black" features, whereas those who were told he was white did the reverse, exaggerating his "typically white" features. Although the students were looking at exactly the same photograph, they perceived the image through a lens that was tinted with the racial label that the researcher provided earlier in the experiment. [continue]

Views: 37

© 2017   Created by Atheist Universe.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service