Latest Activity

We are a worldwide social network of freethinkers, atheists, agnostics and secular humanists.

Birthdays

Birthdays Tomorrow

Fascinating new evidence of 1 million year old plant and animal ash in a South african cave suggests that our ancestors were already cooking their food. Judging from the age of the ash, it is likely that the cooks were Homo erectus. Paleontologists ruled out a spontaneous fire started by, for example, lightening, because the cave is very deep, and one of the earliest sites of known human habitation. They also ruled out a fire ignited by bat feces, or guano, that is known to spontaneously combust occasionally,; they found no traces of guano in the cave. Since cooking makes food more easy to digest and therefore more energy-containing, it is important to know when humans have actually realized the advantages of cooking and used it in a regular basis. The earliest proven evidence of regular cooking is currently ~ 400,000 years old, from a site in England and another in Germany. More evidence is needed to be sure that humans were cooking their food already 1 million years ago, but this South African ash is a great start. This however, does not mean the humans had already figured out how to light a fire, but that they could have used it when available. 

Million-year-old ash hints at origins of cooking


South African cave yields earliest evidence for human use of fire.

02 April 2012

The discovery is the earliest evidence yet found for use of this revolutionary technology, say the researchers behind the finding. But some experts caution that more proof is needed before we conclude that humans were cooking regularly at this date.

The plant and animal ash was found thirty metres inside the Wonderwerk Cave — beyond the reach of a lightning strike.

GREATSTOCK PHOTOGRAPHIC LIBRARY / ALAMY

Francesco Berna, an archaeologist at Boston University in Massachusetts, and his colleagues found ash of burnt grass, leaves, brush and bone fragments in sediments 30 metres inside the Wonderwerk Cave in the Northern Cape province. The cave is one of the oldest known sites of human habitation, showing traces of having been lived in from almost two million years ago.

It is not possible to say for certain which species of hominin inhabited the cave one million years ago, but the team believes it was probably Homo erectus.

The bits of ash, which range from a few millimetres to a few centimetres long, are well preserved. They have jagged edges, showing that they were not burned elsewhere and blown or washed into the cave, which would have worn such edges away.

Berna and his colleagues searched the sediments for bat faeces, because large piles of rotting guano can become hot enough to ignite spontaneously. But there were no traces of such droppings.

“This left us with the conclusion that the fire had to have been created by hominins,” says Berna. The evidence is published today in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences1.

Read the rest here

Tags: Homo erectus, archaeology, cooking, paleontology

Views: 49

Replies to This Discussion

The abstract of the original article:

Microstratigraphic evidence of in situ fire in the Acheulean strata of Wonderwerk Cave, Northern Cape province, South Africa

  1. Francesco Bernaa,1
  2. Paul Goldberga,b
  3. Liora Kolska Horwitzc
  4. James Brinkd,e,
  5. Sharon Holtd
  6. Marion Bamfordf, and 
  7. Michael Chazang

+Author Affiliations

  1. aDepartment of Archaeology, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215;
  2. bRole of Culture in Early Expansions of Humans, Heidelberg Academy of Science and Humanities, 72070 Tübingen, Germany;
  3. cNatural History Collections, Faculty of Life Sciences, Hebrew University, Jerusalem 91904, Israel;
  4. dFlorisbad Quaternary Research Department, National Museum, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa;
  5. eCentre for Environmental Management, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa;
  6. fBernard Price Institute for Palaeontological Research, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2050, South Africa; and
  7. gDepartment of Anthropology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 2S2
  1. Edited by Donald K. Grayson, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, and approved February 24, 2012 (received for review October 25, 2011)

Abstract

The ability to control fire was a crucial turning point in human evolution, but the question when hominins first developed this ability still remains. Here we show that micromorphological and Fourier transform infrared microspectroscopy (mFTIR) analyses of intact sediments at the site of Wonderwerk Cave, Northern Cape province, South Africa, provide unambiguous evidence—in the form of burned bone and ashed plant remains—that burning took place in the cave during the early Acheulean occupation, approximately 1.0 Ma. To the best of our knowledge, this is the earliest secure evidence for burning in an archaeological context.

Were the evidence to be proven correct then that means that our forbears were a lot smarter than what we make them out to be!

Because one way to light a fire is to carry embers from the last fire that you had. Besides rubbing sticks together or using flint stones to ignite a flame.

One reason that the evidence survived was because it was well in to a cave. Any evidence for an outside fire would virtually negligible today due to the fact the ashes and charcoal would be scattered by natural agents such as wind and rain and wild animals. 

So hopefully that one day more evidence will turn up in another cave one day to back the evidence in this cave.

 Yes, it is true, the ashes were preserved because they were so deep into a cave, and only when microspectroscopic analysis was done, they were revealed. So now they know what techniques to use to go looking for evidence in other really old sites of human habitation. 

We have at hand so many technological apparatuses at our disposal these days it is just a case of how can we apply those devices in our quest to satisfy our curiosity. Then as an inquirer we also have to keep abreast of the apparatuses that we can make use of in our inquiries to satisfy our curiousness about the world around us.

And again the most likely sources are are going to be caves that need not be as deep as the first cave but deep enough to preserve the remains of the fire till the inflow of dust and detritus has a chance to bury it to preserve the ashes. 

Building a fire is hard -

 

How to Build a Fire: 12 steps (with pictures) - wikiHow

Mar 21, 2012 – How to Build a Fire. Lighting a fire is only half the battle. The way you build a fire - that is, how you arrange the wood - can affect how long the ...

A nice blog explaining why it's so hard to figure out when humans first started cooking or mastering fire.

First flames: earliest man-made fire found?

Posted on April 5, 2012

ResearchBlogging.orgIn the stereotypical view of prehistory, fire is important. We imagine caveman and cavewoman gathering around a cavefire to heat their cavehouse. In our minds eye fire was a key component of prehistoric life and this image is surprisingly close to the truth.

Fire was indeed an important part of our cultural evolution. It allowed us to extend daylight hours artificially and efficiently process a wider range of foods, amongst other things. It would have undoubtedly had a large impact on both our biology and our behaviour.

Some people do overplay the importance of fire, suggesting it allowed us to efficiently process food which in turn prompted a decrease in gut size that freed up energy so our brains could grow. This is a variant of the expensive tissue hypothesis, an idea with little evidentiary support.

Nonetheless, fire was an important technological achievement. The question thus becomes, when did man become lord of the flame?

It's funny because this doesn't answer the question.

It's funny because it doesn't answer the question.

Answering this question is easy in one respect but awfully difficult in another.

On the one hand fire leaves behind ash which, provided it isn’t scattered, will typically form a very distinct band in the stratigraphy of a site and can be easily spotted. Thus finding when and where fire happened isn’t that hard.

However, understanding the “why” of fire is a lot more difficult. Was the ash produced by natural means or by people? Were the people able to start the fire or did they just steal a burning bush from a wildfire and simply cultivate it? These questions are a lot harder to answer.

One good measure of whether a fire was man-made or simply a natural occurrence (which could’ve been harnessed by people) is the frequency of fires at  particular site. If they are common then its a good indication they aren’t simply exploiting infrequent bushfires.

A stratigraphic cross-section of a neanderthal cave in France (Roc de Marsal). Note the distinct darker bands of ash.

Such rigorous evidence of fire use can be found at the Roc de Marsal cave shelter.... This neanderthal site contains multiple hearths, dating to between 71 and 91 thousand years ago. It would seem hominins could control fire by at least this date.

Less secure (but still relatively reliable) evidence can push this date back to ~300,000 years ago when hominins started using fire to alter their tools. Possible hearths have also been recovered from this date.

There is circumstantial evidence suggesting fire was used as early as 800,000 years ago, although this could easily be explained as (at best) the simple exploitation of natural fires.

However, a new South African site purports to overturn all of this; claiming evidence for controlled use of fire can be found as early as 1 million years ago!

Read the rest here

I think the realization that naturally-occurring fire could be "preserved" or cultivated was a way more important step than later on devising ways to provoke fresh fires (discoveries that were very probably chance events.) Getting the notion that such an otherwise terrifying thing could actually be beneficial implied willfully overcoming all sorts of natural fears. Evidence of fire exploitation dating back to a million years would be very exciting.

Curiosity did not kill the hominid =)

I think that the neuroticism of our ancestors was beneficial. I mean, what animal in its right mind will get close to fire or think of transporting it into its den?? LOL

A very curious animal.

This just in! This is all wrong! Creation Revolution uses the Word of God to disprove this finding.

First fire wasn’t 1 million years ago – misguided mondays

Posted on April 23, 2012

For those of you keeping up with this blog, I recently wrote about the discovery of fire being controlled by hominins 1 million years ago, ~700,000 years earlier than previously thought. For those of you not keeping up (or simply fancy a refresher), here is a link.

However, it turns out even this latest figure isn’t completely accurate. Ground-breaking work by Creation Revolution suggests the scientific figure may be wrong.

Prior to this discovery, evolutionists placed the earliest known use of fire to be around 300,000 years ago.  The new find pushes that date back to one million years ago, that is you believe their dates.

If you believe their dates? The author sounds skeptical, I wonder why. Maybe there is more to the discovery than I picked up on and I missed some aspect of taphonomy that casts doubt on the 1 million year old date of of the find.

When I wanted to find out when man first used fire, I turned to the only reliable source and that is the Word of God.  From God’s Word, there is a hint of the use of fire not after God created man.

Oh no wait, it’s just the Bible. Which is the only reliable source of information on the origin of fire, apparently.

I include the “apparently” because he offers no justification for the acceptance of the biblical chronology over any other, no reason the original scientific paper on the subject might be flawed. It is literally just “science says that, it is wrong.”

Which is rather disappointing. The Institute for Creation Research (ICR), another creationist organisation, at least try to provide some justification for why their ideas are correct. Granted they horrifically mangle the science in the process, but at least they try.

Read the rest here.

Calling their god a liar again! They are!

RSS

© 2013   Created by Atheist Universe.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service