Feedback and Notes

Latest Activity

Chris commented on Hope's group Imagine No Religion
7 hours ago
Chris commented on Doone's group 99.999999999% of the World and Trump Embarrasses Us News
8 hours ago
Stephen commented on Stephen's group Secularism in the UK and Europe.
8 hours ago
Stephen left a comment for Terry Nichols
10 hours ago
Stephen left a comment for pansy
11 hours ago
Stephen left a comment for Empetrum Nigrum
11 hours ago
Stephen left a comment for Baron Gerrick
11 hours ago
Chris commented on Elizabeth Geiger's blog post Research study examining community involvement and other lived experiences among atheist individuals
11 hours ago
Chris commented on Elizabeth Geiger's blog post Research study examining community involvement and other lived experiences among atheist individuals
11 hours ago
Chris commented on Elizabeth Geiger's blog post Research study examining community involvement and other lived experiences among atheist individuals
11 hours ago
Chris commented on Adriana's group Freethought and Funny Bones
11 hours ago
Chris commented on Adriana's group Freethought and Funny Bones
12 hours ago
Stephen commented on Adriana's group Freethought and Funny Bones
12 hours ago
Chris commented on Matthew James's blog post The Cult
12 hours ago
Mrs.B commented on Julien's group The Music Box
14 hours ago
Gal Gadot posted a blog post
17 hours ago
Mrs.B commented on Adriana's group Freethought and Funny Bones
18 hours ago
Stephen commented on Adriana's group Freethought and Funny Bones
18 hours ago
Stephen commented on Adriana's group Freethought and Funny Bones
18 hours ago
Mrs.B commented on A Former Member's group Animal | Vegetable | Mineral
19 hours ago

We are a worldwide social network of freethinkers, atheists, agnostics and secular humanists.

House Republicans secretly vote to gut Office of Congressional Ethics

Let's get this party started! 

In a secret vote held behind closed doors Monday night, House Republican voted to cripple the Office of Congressional Ethics, an independent body created in 2008 to rein in corruption and other misconduct by members of Congress.

The move was spearheaded “by lawmakers who have come under investigation in recent years,” according to Politico. Among those speaking in favor of the changes were Rep. Blake Farenthold (R-TX), who was accused by a staffer of sexual harassment, and Rep. Peter Roskam (R-IL), who allegedly received “an impermissible gift when he and his wife traveled to Taiwan in October 2011.”

Under the new rules, the Office of Congressional Ethics would be renamed the Office of Congressional Complaint Review and, critically, lose its independence. It would be placed under the auspices of the House Ethics Committee, which famously has turned a blind eye to wrongdoing by members of Congress. It became clear that an independent body was necessary after scandals largely ignored by the the Ethics Committee sent several members of Congress, including Randy “Duke” Cunningham and Bob Ney, to jail.

Truthout

Views: 53

Replies to This Discussion

Neal, I don't trust politicians as far as I can throw a dozen of them, but I did a search and found that Cunningham and Ney were prosecuted and jailed BEFORE Congress created the independent Office of Congressional Ethics (OCE) in 2008.

Which office or committee investigated them?

The article states those who have been investigated in the past, not necessarily by the OCE, were those wanting to get rid of them.

From Politico:

One of those was Rep. Blake Farenthold, the Texas Republican who was accused by a former staffer of sexual harassment. The OCE recommended in September 2015 that the Ethics panel drop a probe of the matter, but Farenthold did not like the way the case was handled. A court later threw out the staffers' lawsuit as well.

Texas Republican Blake Farenthold was among those who raised issues with the Office of Congressional Ethics.
Texas Republican Blake Farenthold was among those who raised issues with the Office of Congressional Ethics. | AP Photo
Rep. Peter Roskam (R-Ill.) also spoke in support of the measure. The Ethics Committee, at the behest of OCE, had probed whether Roskam accepted an impermissible gift when he and his wife traveled to Taiwan in October 2011. The Ethics Committee approved the Roskams’ trip beforehand as permissible under federal law, but OCE believed the Taiwanese government and not the Chinese Culture University — the official sponsor — “was conducting and organizing his trip.”

The Roskams’ daughter was also staying in Taiwan at that time, and OCE noted that the Roskams sought to include her as part of their itinerary for the $24,000-plus trip. Roskam strongly denied any improper or unethical behavior, and the Ethics Committee eventually dropped the case.

Reps. Sam Graves (R-Mo.) and Steve Pearce (R-N.M.) also vocally supported the amendment. They or their staff had come under OCE's microscope.


http://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/house-republicans-gut-their-o...

Thanks, Neal, for the extra info.

That the deed was done behind closed doors by itself makes it suspect.

Here in California, voters passed an initiative measure that will require the Demo-majority legislature to publish bills on the Internet for 72 hours before their final votes. The legislature had been passing lobbyist-written bills in evening sessions without public hearings.

Of the fifty states, eighteen have the direct initiative and voters can pass laws without interference by corrupt legislatures. In 32 states, voters are victims of those they elect.

If you want to follow this kind of news, go to ballotpedia.org and subscribe to its free emails.

Thanks for the link, I'll give it a look.

But I have to admit the vote by the House to gut the powers of the office of Congressional ethics is the most blatant I've seen in some time. What has the press said about the vote. Due to previous misconduct and corruption by MPs and members of the upper house (Lords) the UK Parliament has really strict rules and regulations these are run by an independent commission.

They backed off. Apparently, behind closed doors secret votes aren't too popular. =)

That bill failed after many calls from constituents.
Participation from the electorate seemed to work this time.

There are many more though. Tom Price for NIH for example.
Nominations are processing so fast it's difficult to keep up with all the potential conflicts of interest.

The Array of Conflicts of Interest
Facing the Trump Presidency

(stalled)

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/12/01/us/politics/trump-co...

More potential conflicts of interest
(stalled - no editor bar)
http://time.com/4578431/donald-trump-conflicts-of-interest-list/

And that brilliant founder, Alexander Hamilton in 1787, said government by "the rich and well born" would be safe because they would see no advantage in changing it.

Insider trading and congress  - The Stock Act.

By Rebecca Shabad CBS News January 17, 2017, 8:54 AM
HHS nominee Tom Price faces insider trading accusations

President-elect Donald Trump’s nominee to lead the Department of Health and Human Services bought shares in a medical device company last year and then introduced legislation in the House to help the company less than a week later, CBS News has confirmed.

The new revelations about Rep. Tom Price, first reported by CNN on Monday evening, raises new ethics concerns and questions about whether Price engaged in insider trading. This comes just days before he’s slated to testify at his Senate confirmation hearing on Wednesday.

According to House records, Price, R-Georgia, bought between $1,000 to $15,000 worth of shares in the company Zimmer Biomet last March.

Days later, he introduced a bill that would have delayed a regulation until 2018 that industry analysts said would financially hurt Zimmer Biomet. Records show that after the introduction of the measure, the company’s political action committee donated to Price’s reelection campaign.

In a statement Tuesday, Zimmer Biomet’s vice president for corporate communications, Monica Kendrick, said that the firm didn’t know about Price’s purchase of stock in the company and said it wasn’t involved in the introduction of his bill to delay the regulation.

“Zimmer Biomet had no knowledge of Congressman Price’s purchase of Zimmer Biomet stock. As is common practice, the Zimmer Biomet PAC regularly makes donations to various political campaigns, all of which are disclosed as required by law,” she said. “These actions are not connected. Zimmer Biomet has supported the Comprehensive Joint Replacement (CJR) program developed and implemented by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Zimmer Biomet was not involved in the Healthy Inpatient Procedures (HIP) Act, which was introduced by Congressman Price to delay CJR implementation.”

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-New York, said in a statement Monday that the Office of Congressional Ethics must “conduct an immediate and thorough investigation into these potential violations of the STOCK Act before Rep. Price’s nomination moves forward.” The STOCK Act was designed to combat insider trading among members of Congress.

“This new report makes clear that this isn’t just a couple of questionable trades, but rather a clear and troubling pattern of Congressman Price trading stock and using his office to benefit the companies in which he is investing,” Schumer said. “The President-elect claims he wants to drain the swamp, but Congressman Price has spent his career filling it up.”

This comes after The Wall Street Journal reported in December that Price traded more than $300,000 in healthcare stocks over the last four years while advocating or sponsoring bills that could have affected the stocks of those companies.

CBS News’ Steve Chaggaris and Emi Feldman contributed to this report.

RSS

© 2017   Created by Atheist Universe.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service