
doone replied to doone's discussion Ugly Pictures of Animals in the group Animal | Vegetable | Mineral
Hope replied to Neal's discussion Sharia law used in the United Arab Emirates to jail Australian woman after she was gang-raped in the group Atheists in the Middle East
Hope replied to Hope's discussion Person of the day in the group Atheists in the Middle East
Matttammar commented on Robert Joseph Jagiello's blog post From What Sources Do You Derive Strength and Consolation As you Face the Abyss?
Michel posted a videoWe are a worldwide social network of freethinkers, atheists, agnostics and secular humanists.
Supreme Court here it comes.
By DENISE LAVOIE 05/31/12 01:36 PM ET
BOSTON — A federal appeals court Thursday declared that the Defense of Marriage Act unconstitutionally denies federal benefits to married gay couples, a groundbreaking ruling all but certain to wind up before the U.S. Supreme Court.
In its unanimous decision, the three-judge panel of the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston said the 1996 law that defines marriage as a union between a man and a woman deprives gay couples of the rights and privileges granted to heterosexual couples.
The court didn't rule on the law's more politically combustible provision, which said states without same-sex marriage cannot be forced to recognize gay unions performed in states where it's legal. It also wasn't asked to address whether gay couples have a constitutional right to marry.
The law was passed at a time when it appeared Hawaii would legalize gay marriage. Since then, many states have instituted their own bans on gay marriage, while eight states have approved it, led by Massachusetts in 2004.
The court, the first federal appeals panel to deem the benefits section of the law unconstitutional, agreed with a lower court judge who ruled in 2010 that the law interferes with the right of a state to define marriage and denies married gay couples federal benefits given to heterosexual married couples, including the ability to file joint tax returns.
Tags: Doma, court, district, federal, unconstitutional

Permalink Reply by doone on May 31, 2012 at 5:11pm Good News and typical reaction from the right wing and their typical overreaction to anything positive for other human beings.
Posted on | May 31, 2012 | 3 Comments and 0 Reactions
“Progress” is happening so fast nowadays, eh? Back in the 1990s, President Clinton implemented “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell” and DOMA, which stood uncontested through the remainder of Clinton’s term and all through the eight years of Bush, but now — in the Obama era — these measures have been declared dreadfully oppressive.
Hope! Change! And it’s probably only a matter of time before homosexuality is declared compulsory, so that turning down an offer of sodomy is illegal “discrimination.”

Permalink Reply by Susan Stanko on May 31, 2012 at 5:24pm By that logic we are all discriminators because we all make choices who to date or not date. Do these people bother to think at all?
© 2013 Created by Atheist Universe.
Powered by
Badges | Report an Issue | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
