Latest Activity

doone commented on Hope's group Imagine No Religion
5 minutes ago
doone commented on Hope's group Imagine No Religion
6 minutes ago
Chris commented on Neal's photo
2 hours ago
RICHARD CARSCADDEN commented on Neal's photo
8 hours ago
Carla DeVries posted songs
9 hours ago
Chris commented on Neal's photo
10 hours ago

Carla DeVries just added their location.
(via Member Map)

10 hours ago
Chris commented on Neal's video
10 hours ago
Chris commented on Neal's photo
10 hours ago
doone replied to Adriana's discussion Science Bits, News, Videos in the group Science!
15 hours ago
doone gave a gift to Nathan Hevenstone
15 hours ago
Dallas the Phallus commented on Adriana's group Gender Blender
15 hours ago
Dallas the Phallus replied to Dallas the Phallus's discussion The New Words Thread: Things you ran across, remembered, or had to look up in the group A World of Words
16 hours ago
doone commented on Chris's group Right Wing Whackos
17 hours ago
doone commented on Radu Andreiu's group Mathematics
17 hours ago
doone commented on Dallas the Phallus's group THE NAKED APE
17 hours ago

We are a worldwide social network of freethinkers, atheists, agnostics and secular humanists.

Is human activity pushing our planet to a tipping point?

A multidisciplinary group of 21 scientists have published an important article in Nature this week, based on 100 scientific papers on environmental tipping points or shifts. Physicist Kenneth Wilson was awarded a Nobel Prize in 1982 for the mathematics describing tipping points. Possible environmental tipping points have been described for small systems like ponds, to huge systems like the Sahara or the Amazon forest. Scientists suspect that a tipping point, a sudden reconfiguration of environmental systems resulted in the Cambrian explosion, 540 million years ago, when the diversity of life exploded into a myriad new life forms. While tipping points can occur, like in the Cambrian, due to natural factors, now we have a new force to contend with: 7 billion of us influencing basically every corner of our planet. Human activity covers 43% of the surface of the Earth but affects twice that area, so basically the whole globe. Twenty % of the life produced on land is for human consumption; and >30% of the entire planet's fresh water is used by humans. Scientists say that at this point, we are a force to contend with, and our activity can radically change ecological systems and regional climates, to a tipping point. A critical transition may well happen during the next century. The science is solid but it is still suggestive and not conclusive, like most models. But even though time will tell, this is a question of risk-benefit ratio, like so many human activities (including preventive medicine). The current information should be a cry for innovations, such as changes in food production, alternative fuel sources, reduce the population, and manage the ecosystems better, to achieve sustainability. 

Brandom Keim at Wired Science reports on this important review article, see below:

Is Humanity Pushing Earth Past a Tipping Point?

Could human activity push Earth’s biological systems to a planet-wide tipping point, causing changes as radical as the Ice Age’s end — but with less pleasant results, and with billions of people along for a bumpy ride?

It’s by no means a settled scientific proposition, but many researchers say it’s worth considering — and not just as an apocalyptic warning or far-fetched speculation, but as a legitimate question raised by emerging science.

“There are some biological realities we can’t ignore,” said paleoecologist Anthony Barnosky of the University of California, Berkeley. “What I’d like to avoid is getting caught by surprise.”

In “Approaching a state shift in Earth’s biosphere,” published June 6 in Nature, Barnosky and 21 co-authors cite 100 papers in summarizing what’s known about environmental tipping points.

While the concept was popularized by Malcolm Gladwell’s accounts of sudden, widespread changes in society, the underlying mathematics — which won physicist Kenneth Wilson a Nobel Prize in 1982 — have far-reaching implications.

In the last few decades, scientists have found tipping behaviors in various natural environments, from locale-scale ponds and coral reefs to regional systems like the Sahara desert, which until 5,500 years ago was a fertile grassland, and perhaps even the Amazon basin.

Deforestation in the Amazon jungle, which some scientists say could become a savannah. Image: NASA

Common to these examples is a type of transformation not described in traditional ideas of nature as existing in a static balance, with change occurring gradually. Instead, the systems seem to be dynamic, ebbing and flowing within a range of biological parameters.

Stress those parameters — with fast-rising temperatures, say, or a burst of nutrients — and systems are capable of sudden, feedback loop-fueled reconfiguration.

According to some researchers, that’s what happened when life’s diversity exploded in an eyeblink 540 million years ago, or much more recently when a glacier-chilled Earth became in a couple thousand years the temperate garden that cradled human civilization.

But while the Cambrian explosion and Holocene warming were sparked by natural, planet-wide changes to ocean chemistry and solar intensity, say Barnosky and colleagues, there’s a new force to consider: 7 billion people who exert a combined influence usually associated with planetary processes.

Read the rest here.

Tags: Earth, anthropocene, ecosystems, environment, human, sustainability, tipping point

Views: 90

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Here is the abstract of the original publication. Unfortunately the whole article is behind a paywall. 

Approaching a state shift in Earth’s biosphere

Anthony D. Barnosky, Elizabeth A. Hadly, Jordi Bascompte, Eric L. Berlow, James H. Brown, Mikael Fortelius, Wayne M. Getz, John Harte, Alan Hastings, Pablo A. Marquet, Neo D. Martinez, Arne Mooers, Peter Roopnarine, Geerat Vermeij, John W. Williams, Rosemary Gillespie, Justin Kitzes, Charles Marshall, Nicholas Matzke, David P. Mindell, Eloy Revilla & Adam B. Smith

Nature 486, 52–58 (07 June 2012) doi:10.1038/nature11018
Published online 06 June 2012

Localized ecological systems are known to shift abruptly and irreversibly from one state to another when they are forced across critical thresholds. Here we review evidence that the global ecosystem as a whole can react in the same way and is approaching a planetary-scale critical transition as a result of human influence. The plausibility of a planetary-scale ‘tipping point’ highlights the need to improve biological forecasting by detecting early warning signs of critical transitions on global as well as local scales, and by detecting feedbacks that promote such transitions. It is also necessary to address root causes of how humans are forcing biological changes.

We need less people, more planning, more modeling of the  future and a better understanding of the science behind our possible engineering of the planet.   Fewer people will help.

We hopped off the cliff, and the christian right is simply looking up and feeling the wind in the hair. Considering half of America believes in biblical literalism and they oppose global warming for ridiculous theological ideas there is nothing that can be done.

There is another article in Nature this week saying that the loss of biodiversity threatens our well being:

Loss of biodiversity increasingly threatens human well-being

Thursday, June 7, 2012

 
Earth image Courtesy of Shutterstock
 

The loss of the planet's biological diversity is increasingly threatening Mother Nature's ability to provide humans with goods and services like food, water, fodder, fertile soils, and protection from pests and disease, according to a sweeping review of 20 years of research by an international team of ecologists, including biologists from the University of British Columbia and McGill.

The 17 researchers present their findings in the June 7 edition of the journal Nature in a scientific consensus statement that summarizes evidence that has emerged from more than 1,000 ecological studies conducted since the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

"We've reached a point where efforts to preserve species and biological diversity might no longer be an act of altruism," says Diane Srivastava, Professor with the Department of Zoology and the Biodiversity Research Centre at University of British Columbia and author on the paper.

"This research review dramatically underscores the importance of strengthening--not weakening or curtailing--environmental assessment processes in order to stem the tide of the loss of species and diversity that so many humans benefit from and depend on. This is particularly true in economies heavily reliant on natural resources,like British Columbia's."

The balance of evidence reviewed in the study shows that genetic diversity increases the yield of commercial crops, enhances the production of wood in tree plantations, improves the production of fodder in grasslands, and increases the stability of yields in fisheries. Plant diversity also contributes to greater resistance to invasion by exotic plants, inhibits plant pathogens such as fungal and viral infections, increases above-ground carbon sequestration through enhanced biomass, and increases nutrient remineralization and soil organic matter.

"Much as the consensus statements by doctors led to public warnings that tobacco use is harmful to your health, this is a consensus statement by experts who agree that loss of Earth's wild species will be harmful to the world's ecosystems and may harm society by reducing ecosystem services that are essential to human health and prosperity," said Bradley Cardinale, Associate Professor at the University of Michigan and leader of the research effort.

"We need to take biodiversity loss far more seriously – from individuals to international governing bodies – and take greater action to prevent further losses of species."

The call to action comes as international leaders prepare to gather in Rio de Janeiro on June 20 for the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development, known as the Rio+20 Conference. The upcoming conference marks the 20th anniversary of 1992 Earth Summit in Rio, which resulted in 193 nations supporting the Convention on Biological Diversity's goals of biodiversity conservation and the sustainable use of natural resources.

"We believe that ongoing loss of biological diversity is diminishing the ability of ecosystems to sustain human societies," says Andrew Gonzalez, Associate Professor with the Department of Biology and the Quebec Centre for Biodiversity Science at McGill University and author on thepaper.

###

University of British Columbia: http://www.ubc.ca

Happily, if you don't like the hypothesis, you can stick your head in the sand with the rest of the anti-science crowd. Crappy company, but still company.

 I agree entirely that we're facing a big environmental change  Even 30 years ago, the destruction of the Amazon forest had dramatic environmental impact.  One would have to be blind not to notice thlee climate worlwide changes; so yes, I believe the earth is at a tipping point, and man is largely responsible, I think.

I agree with you Doone about needing less people, better understanding of our Planet and its environments so that we can plan our way of life so that it becomes re-enmeshed with lives of the flora and fauna of this planet. That way our overall impact on the world and its resources is the most minimal we can achieve.

How Much Can Earth Endure?

Nils at Small Precautions traces the exponential loss of animal species to a time well before modern trade and industrialization:

[T]he processes we've become acutely conscious of over the past couple of decades and which usually gets labelled "climate change" didn't actually begin with industrial revolution 250 years ago, but rather 40,000 years ago, when humans arrived in Australia, which began the process of mass mega-fauna extinction. This continued with the arrival of humans in the Americas, about 15K years ago, which also resulted in the loss of many of the continents' large beasts. What's happened since then forms a single continuous process of progressive human "commandeering" of the planet's resources.

Dave Roberts fears that the planet is nearing a dangerous tipping point.

"Nature, Increasingly, Is Us"

Christopher Mims considers how humans have taken over the planet:

We consider “nature” to be whatever we experienced as children, and, limited by our incomplete grasp of history and our short lifespans, are only capable of recognizing short windows of change in what is by now the most profound transformation the Earth has experienced since the great extinctions of yore — that is, the human experiment. As a result, few of us are aware that Boston harbor used to be so full of lobsters that the crustacean was considered a food fit only for the poor. 

His conclusion:

There is no "nature" left — only the portion of nature that we allow to live because we imagine it serves some purpose — as a thing to eat, a place to reprocess our waste, or an idea that fulfills our dwindling desire to maintain "the natural" for aesthetic or ideological reasons.

He summed it up quite well and I agree with his summation.

THE END OF NATURE

Christopher Mims in Mother Board:

ScreenHunter_32 Jun. 12 20.22If you think of the Earth as a space ship with an energy budget that equals the input of the sun, which is exactly what it is, then you can imagine that there is a total quantity of biological productivity of which our planet is capable. Estimates say that humans are already appropriating between one quarter and one half of this productivity. The total amount of land given to crops is tied with forests as the single largest terrestrial ecosystem. Our food production requires almost a quarter of the total land area of the planet.

We have basically killed most of the wildlife that was available to us only a single generation ago. Chief scientist of the Nature Conservancy Peter Kareiva has declared that while 13 percent of Earth’s landmass is now protected as some sort of park — an area larger than all of South America — we have completely failed to stop the eradication of the plant and animal inhabitants of these “wild” places. Much of this is due to the fact that wild things are apparently quite tasty. And if you think this is limited to the land, the evidence is that our oceans are in even worse shape, with global fishing stocks set to collapse by mid-century. Meanwhile, as we all know, climate change is only accelerating what scientists now call the “sixth extinction.” Or in other words, the sixth time in the 4 billion year history of life on earth that the entire planet was so challenged that a vast majority of life came perilously close to being snuffed out.

More here.

Posted by Abbas Raza at 02:22 PM | Permalink 

So depressing. I still have hopes that we can stop and even reverse some of the damage.

RSS

© 2013   Created by Atheist Universe.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service