Feedback and Notes

We are a worldwide social network of freethinkers, atheists, agnostics and secular humanists.

Humanlike Footprints

Humanlike footprints, supposedly 150–600 million years old, have been found in rock formations in Utah (a), Kentucky (b), Missouri (c), and possibly Pennsylvania (d). At Laetoli, in the east African country of Tanzania, a team headed by Mary Leakey found a sequence of humanlike footprints (e). They were dated at 3.7 million years. If human feet made any of these prints, then evolutionary chronology is drastically wrong.

 

astrophysicalsciences-footprints_and_trilobite.jpg Image Thumbnail

Figure 30: Humanlike Footprints with Trilobite. In 1968, 43 miles northwest of Delta, Utah, William J. Meister found this and other apparent human shoe prints inside a 2-inch-thick slab of rock. Also in that slab were obvious trilobite fossils, one of which was squashed under the “heel.” The 10-inch-long shoe print is at the left, and its rock mold is to its right. According to evolutionists, trilobites became extinct 240 million years before humans evolved. Notice how the back of the heel is worn, just as most of our shoes wear today. The heel was indented in the rock about an eighth of an inch deeper than the sole. Others have since made similar discoveries at this location, although this is the only fossil where a trilobite was inside an apparent shoe print.

a. Melvin A. Cook, “William J. Meister Discovery of Human Footprints with Trilobites in a Cambrian Formation of Western Utah,” Why Not Creation?  editor Walter E. Lammerts (Phillipsburg, New Jersey: Presbyterian and Reformed Publishing Co., 1970), pp. 185–193.

Michael A. Cremo and Richard L. Thompson, Forbidden Archeology (San Diego: Bhaktivedanta Institute, 1993), pp. 810–813.

b. “Geology and Ethnology Disagree about Rock Prints,” Science News Letter, 10 December 1938, p. 372.

c. Henry R. Schoolcraft and Thomas H. Benton, “Remarks on the Prints of Human Feet, Observed in the Secondary Limestone of the Mississippi Valley,” The American Journal of Science and Arts, Vol. 5, 1822, pp. 223–231.

d. “Human-Like Tracks in Stone are Riddle to Scientists,” Science News Letter, 29 October 1938, pp. 278–279.

e. “‘Make no mistake about it,’ says Tim [White, who is probably recognized as the leading authority on the Laetoli footprints]. ‘They are like modern human footprints. If one were left in the sand of a California beach today, and a four-year-old were asked what it was, he would instantly say that someone had walked there. He wouldn’t be able to tell it from a hundred other prints on the beach, nor would you. The external morphology is the same. There is a well-shaped modern heel with a strong arch and a good ball of the foot in front of it. The big toe is straight in line. It doesn’t stick out to the side like an ape toe, or like the big toe in so many drawings you see of Australopithecines in books.’” Johanson and Edey, p. 250.

The big toe of Australopithecus africanus splayed out to the side, as in apes. Obviously, the Laetoli footprints were not made by Australopithecines, as most evolutionists claim.

“In sum, the 3.5-million-year-old footprint trails at Laetoli Site G resemble those of habitually unshod modern humans. None of their features suggest that the Laetoli hominids were less capable bipeds than we are. If the G footprints were not known to be so old, we would readily conclude that they were made by a member of our genus, Homo. ... we should shelve the loose assumption that the Laetoli footprints were made by Lucy’s kind, Australopithecus afarensis.” Russell H. Tuttle, “The Pitted Pattern of Laetoli Feet,” Natural History, Vol. 99, March 1990, p. 64.

[http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/AstroPhysicalSciences28.html#wp1434426]

Views: 268

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Happy year of the Monkey.

I've had numerous contractors at may house lately who for my blame I allowed them to discuss their religious beliefs - many hold the 6500 year old earth theory.  It's difficult to understand if they think this is myth or reality.

Sadly most of them probably do.

No the  earth it isn't 6500 years old - It's 6550 years old!

Yeh but what time of day did it begin AM or PM

Chuckle 24 hour time clock GMT I'd imagine.

Oh I see you believe they are Human footprints

IF THIS IS TRUE YOU HAVE TO ASK YOURSELF WHAT THE HELL IS GOING IN PARTS OF AMERICA

South Carolina 'creationist' science quiz is real

A creationism-based 4th grade science quiz from a South Carolina private religious school (page 2 of 2)

https://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/05/10/1208262/-South-Carolina-c...

That's pretty grim, but we hear that here all the time. For a modern country, they are sure backward, & the south is even worse.

I'm almost hoping its not real, but I think it is. How very sad.

So many schools are trying to get rid of any sort of science education, & bring in bybulls instead, that I have no hope for the future of the US, & the US thinks it is always number one in the world!

This coming election is making matters a whole lot worse!

I think/hope much of this is a joke - though people who are "home/biblically based" schooled may actually believe this nonsense.  With Christians as with Muslims it should be obvious the problems it causes.

I understand that many people believe Sasquach/Bigfoot is a real entity.

Some can't identify bear footprints (for example) -  Those who don't acknowledge carbon dating then footprints in clay doesn't matter.

Satanic Temple!!!

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/features/education/os-bibles-satanic...

Better is this one:  http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/12/05/satanic-temple-florida-cap...

Scopes and Dover ["Intellegent Design"] law suits seem to be winning the earth is only ~6500 year old argument regarding teaching religion vs. science in classrooms.

RSS

© 2017   Created by Atheist Universe.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service