Latest Activity

Onyango Makagutu posted a status
"Greetings everyone"
6 hours ago
Davy left a comment for micy may
7 hours ago
Tom Sarbeck commented on Marianne's blog post Has science become a new god ?
14 hours ago
Tom Sarbeck replied to Sassan K.'s discussion How does one go from atheism to religion?
15 hours ago
Tom Sarbeck posted a discussion
19 hours ago
Marianne commented on Don's blog post Is Atheism “A Lack of Belief”? Not to An Atheist
21 hours ago
Marianne replied to Davy's discussion Is Our 21st-Century Technology Too Primitive to Detect Advanced Extraterrestrial Life? in the group The Daily Cosmos
21 hours ago
Tom Sarbeck replied to Davy's discussion Is Our 21st-Century Technology Too Primitive to Detect Advanced Extraterrestrial Life? in the group The Daily Cosmos
yesterday
Drew JW replied to Sassan K.'s discussion How does one go from atheism to religion?
yesterday
Marianne Sommersted-Wolff left a comment for Davy
yesterday
Marianne Sommersted-Wolff replied to Atheist Universe's discussion Introduce Yourself
yesterday
Davy left a comment for Bwambale Robert
yesterday
Carl Pastor replied to Atheist Universe's discussion Introduce Yourself
yesterday
Carl Pastor replied to Atheist Universe's discussion Introduce Yourself
yesterday
Carl Pastor replied to Atheist Universe's discussion Introduce Yourself
yesterday
Marianne Sommersted-Wolff replied to Atheist Universe's discussion Introduce Yourself
yesterday

We are a worldwide social network of freethinkers, atheists, agnostics and secular humanists.

 

 

Due to Biblical Archeology, a paradigm shift is undergoing in the historical research on Jesus. The recent discoveries of the Bethesda and Siloam Pools demonstrate that the author of the Gospel of John knew intimate details of pre-70 AD Jerusalem that even Josephus failed to mention. He also knew things about Jerusalem that we did not know 10 years ago. John can no longer be seen as strictly a sophisticated literary work comprised of invented stories to illustrate its theological truths.

The distinctive nature of the Gospel of John has led many modern scholars to conclude that it was the last gospel compiled, dating to the beginning of the second century AD, and is therefore irrelevant for historical studies of Jesus. The Gospel of John is also thought to have a later origin because it displays some ignorance of Jerusalem. Scholars say the author of John knows little about first century Jerusalem because he was never there and the Romans thoroughly destroyed it in 70 AD. Therefore, they say, he invented places like the Bethesda Pool and its five porticoes (John 5) and the Pool of Siloam (John 9), investing in them heavy symbolism as he crafted his theological masterpiece.

Biblical archeology does not prove or disprove the Bible. As Avraham Biran, the late director of the Nelson Glueck School of Biblical Archeology at Hebrew Union College in Jerusalem, once said, “the Bible, as a book of divine inspiration needs no proof.” Yet it is the married of both disciplines – archeology and biblical studies – that is rocking the boat of modern scholarship.

Some of the new archeological finds in the environs of Jerusalem that challenge the detractors of John are:

The Gospel of John was probably written much earlier than often suggested, and is therefore valuable for the study of the historical Jesus – in recreating his time, place and social environment, and in helping us understand his life, actions, teachings and agenda. For instance, John Chapter 5 records the story of the healing of an invalid man at the Pool of Bethesda in Jerusalem. The pool is said to have consisted of five porticoes, or porches. For hundreds of years, people believed the pool did not exist, and read this text symbolically and theologically. “Bethesda” means “house of mercy” and was interpreted to be a symbol for the mercy Jesus showed the disabled man.

In their interpretations, “five porticoes” symbolized the Pentateuch (Five Books of Moses), since a pentagon has not been found in antiquity. And what the Pentateuch could not do, Jesus will do, the scholars thought. John 5:8 reads: “Jesus said to him, “Stand up!” – providing a beautiful explanation of what Jesus does: Spiritually speaking, he makes people upright!

Beginning in the late 1800s and continuing in stages since then, archeological excavations have been carried out in a location in the northeast quadrant of Jerusalem’s Old City based upon literary evidence in Josephus and Eusebius.

The Copper Scroll text discovered in 1947 at Qumran also describes a hidden treasure “in the Bet Eshdatayin (pool precinct) in the pool at the entrance to its smaller basin. Bet Eshdatayin is in the dual Aramaic form and refers to two basins for the pool. Excavations have revealed sections of two massive pools, covered colonnades and a segment of Herodian steps in the general area described in John 5 surrounded the pools on the north, south, east and west, with the fifth portico dividing the 2 pools east to west.

The Herodian steps in the Pool of Bethesda can be seen today and are believed to extend for the length of the southern pool, or approximately 100 meters. It is a massive pool that is mostly covered by a parking lot today. The repetition of steps-landing-steps-landing can be easily seen and is typical of a mikva, a pool or bath used to perform purification rites in Judaism.

In order to enter the courts of the temple located a little over 100 meters from the Bethesda Pool, one had to be pure. To be pure, one had to be fully immersed in “living water.” Thus a host of scholars today believe that the Pool of Bethesda was a first century mikva that served this purpose for tens of thousands of Jerusalem residents and for the thousands more that visited Jerusalem during the three annual pilgrimage feasts.

It has been estimated by some that over 100,000 Jews were in Jerusalem during the feasts. That is a lot of “living water” needed for purification, and it is likely the massive Pool of Bethesda helped to serve this purpose, along with other ritual baths surrounding the Temple.

Rereading John 5 with the pools, colonnades and steps in view, one can now easily envision the story of the disabled man lying on his mat on the landing, who was trying with great difficulty to immerse himself in the water just below. One can also envision another individual racing past him as the water is stirred up.

These discoveries show that the author of John had specific firsthand information about Jerusalem. Other surviving literary records, such as the Copper Scroll, Josephus, Tacitus and the New Testament, refer to the water systems of Jerusalem, but none except John specifically mention the Pool of Bethesda, which was likely destroyed by the Romans in 70 AD.

The story in John 5, therefore, was not a later creation of Christology, explaining the divinity of Jesus (as many scholars argue), but a real historical event that took place in a real time at a real place. That is how, they contend, the author of John knew the details about the pool, its name and its function. The details he provides, add to its credibility and the early date of its authorship.

In addition, John 9 tells the story of Jesus healing a blind man by smearing mud on his eyes and telling him to wash in the Pool of Siloam. This passage has been interpreted on a very Christological basis. Historical theologian concluded there was no Pool of Siloam or a relationship between the Gospel of John and actual history. John invented the story, they said, simply to show how Jesus is the “light of the World” (9:5). John shows the progression from first receiving physical eyesight followed eventually by receiving spiritual eyesight.

But in 2004, archeologists discovered an ancient pool in the southern portion of the City of David excavations, south of the Temple Mount, which had been hidden since 70 AD. The 50-meter northern edge and part of the eastern edge of the pool have been excavated while the remaining pool is on property owned by the Greek Orthodox Church. This pool was also likely a mikve. Both pools represent the largest mikvaot that have been discovered to date in the land of Israel. Also, like the Pool of Bethesda, it is conceivable that Jesus immersed himself in this pool before entering the Temple.

We can now point to the excavated Pool of Bethesda as the site where John says Jesus healed a disabled man. Or, we can sit on the steps of the Pool of Siloam, read John 9 and imagine how the story unfolded before our eyes.

 

Source: The Jerusalem Post Christian Edition, March 2013. Pages 26-29.

 

Tags: Archeology, Bethesda, Bible, Easter, Gospel, Jerusalem, John, Miracles, Pool, Scholarship, More…Temple

Views: 134

Reply to This

© 2014   Created by Atheist Universe.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service